Mediastinal and chest wall limitations to asymmetry of lung inflation

Ken C. Lin, Anna Dizner-Golab, Robert L. Thurer, Stephen H. Loring


The extent to which inflation of one lung increases pleural pressure around the contralateral lung could affect ventilatory function, e.g., after pneumonectomy or lung transplantation. The rise in contralateral pleural pressure is limited by mediastinal stiffness and other chest wall properties. To estimate these properties, we determined an elastance of asymmetric expansion (EAsym) in 20 supine adults undergoing thoracic surgery requiring endobronchial intubation. Esophageal pressure, measured with a balloon catheter, was used as an estimate of pleural pressure for determining chest wall elastance during symmetric inflation. Pressures measured in the left and right lung airways during sequential asymmetric inflations with known volumes were used to calculate EAsym and elastances of left and right lungs by using a four-element mathematical model. Elastances (means ± SD) were 13.0 ± 8.7 (EAsym), 14.0 ± 7.0 (left lung), 12.2 ± 6.1 (right lung), and 6.7 ± 2.1 cmH2O/l (chest wall). EAsym was high in three patients with prior cardiac surgery or mediastinal radiation therapy, suggesting that mediastinal stiffening due to scarring and fibrosis reduced pressure transmission between hemithoraxes. Simulations with a previously published model showed that changes in EAsym in the range of values observed could substantially affect lung ventilation after single-lung transplantation for emphysema.

  • respiratory mechanics
  • esophageal pressure
  • thoracic surgery
  • model

the mechanical properties of the mediastinum and other chest wall structures limit the degree to which left and right lungs will inflate asymmetrically under pathological conditions, such as after pneumonectomy or lung transplantation. In such conditions, the limitation to asymmetric inflation could affect individual lung ventilation. In a previous study (6), our laboratory used a mathematical model to explore mechanical factors causing respiratory dysfunction after single-lung transplantation for emphysema. In that study, the degree to which the native emphysematous lung expands asymmetrically to fill the thorax, limiting expansion of the graft, was shown to depend in part on the compliance of the mediastinum. A relatively noncompliant (stiff) mediastinum could limit the unequal inflation of transplanted and native lungs, whereas a compliant mediastinum could allow progressive expansion of the emphysematous native lung and underinflation of the mechanically normal transplanted lung. It is not known to what extent chest wall properties such as mediastinal compliance limit asymmetric inflation of lungs in humans. Therefore, in anesthetized patients, we measured an elastance (EAsym) that reflects limitation of asymmetric lung expansion. EAsym depends on mediastinal stiffness, the mechanical coupling of left and right sides of the chest wall that limits its asymmetric expansion, and the stiffness of the diaphragm and upper abdominal contents to displacement by a pressure difference between the two hemithoraxes. EAsym was comparable to elastances of lung and chest wall (ECW), and thus could potentially affect the distribution of lung ventilation. Using values of EAsym found in our subjects, we used the previously published model (6) to show how EAsym could affect lung ventilation after single-lung transplantation.


We studied 20 patients who were undergoing thoracic surgery requiring general anesthesia and a double-lumen endobronchial tube. Subjects gave informed consent for the study, which was approved by the Committee on Clinical Investigations. Characteristics and medical conditions of the subjects are listed in Table 1.

View this table:
Table 1.

Patient characteristics

On induction of general anesthesia and pharmacological paralysis, a left double-lumen endobronchial tube (Mallinkrodt, St. Louis, MO) was placed and secured by the anesthesiologist. The endobronchial and tracheal cuffs were inflated to effect pneumatic separation of the left and right lungs, and mechanical ventilation was established with oxygen and a volatile anesthetic. An esophageal balloon catheter (Sensor Medics, Bilthoven, The Netherlands) was passed by mouth into the midesophagus, with its tip 40 cm from the incisors, and inflated with 0.5 ml of air. Pressure at the airway opening and esophagus were measured with variable reluctance transducers (Celesco model LCVR, Chatsworth, CA), and the digitized signals were displayed and recorded (WinDaq 220, DATAQ Instruments, Akron, OH).

First, we recorded esophageal pressure during 1 min of mechanical ventilation with a known tidal volume while the endobronchial airways were connected together. When the patient was oxygenated sufficiently to tolerate 1 min of apnea, the anesthesia circuit was disconnected for 10 s to allow the lungs to deflate to relaxation volume. Then, each endobronchial tube was connected to its own large syringe (AM Systems model CS-2000, Everett, WA) containing 700 ml of air. To avoid nonlinearity of the volume-pressure curve caused by airway closure at low lung volume, we initially inflated each lung with 100 ml from the syringes and allowed the pressure to equilibrate for 5 s. Left and right lungs in alternation were then asymmetrically inflated with 300-ml aliquots until a total of 700 ml had been injected into each lung (see Fig. 1). Each inflation was followed by a 5-s pause for pressure equilibration before measurement of airway pressures. The deflation and asymmetric inflations were repeated three times, with intervening periods of mechanical ventilation to restore normal end-tidal CO2 levels. The first and third series of inflations began with left lung inflation, and the second and fourth series began with right lung inflation. After the fourth series of inflations, the esophageal balloon was removed, and the scheduled surgery began. The entire protocol took ∼10-15 min. Subjects were in the supine posture for all measurements.

Fig. 1.

Representative raw data, with esophageal pressure (Pes) and pressures in the left and right airways (Pleft and Pright, respectively) during an initial period of tidal ventilation of both lungs (while Pleft and Pright were not recorded) followed by 4 series of asymmetric left and right lung inflations (arrows). Chest wall elastance (ECW) was calculated from Pes and tidal volume during tidal ventilation. All other elastances were calculated from airway pressures at the end of 5-s pauses after asymmetric inflations. Dashed vertical lines indicate intervening periods of mechanical ventilation (not recorded).

To determine the extent to which respiratory structures limit asymmetric lung inflation, we calculated EAsym, defined as the left-right difference in pleural pressures divided by the left-right difference in lung volumes, using a four-element analytic model. The calculations for each subject were done twice. In the first analysis, elastances were based on the individual's measured value of ECW and, in the second analysis, on the average value of ECW from all subjects.

Analytic model. To determine the elastic impedance to asymmetric lung inflation, we used a four-element model of the respiratory system, which consisted of two compliant lungs separated by a compliant structure within a compliant chest wall. The pressure acting on the chest is the average of the pleural pressures within the hemithoraxes. In the model, the chest wall expands symmetrically; the effects of asymmetric chest expansion, which reduce EAsym, are attributed to displacement of the compliant structure between the hemithoraxes. In the following, all volumes and pressures are changes from those at relaxation volume with the airway open.

Because the chest wall expands symmetrically, when the volumes of the right (Vright) and left lungs (Vleft) are unequal, the difference in volumes must be accommodated by the mediastinal structure, whose volume displacement is (Vleft - Vright)/2. Under static conditions, the pressures expanding the lungs and chest wall are Pleft - Pplleft, Pright - Pplright, and (Pplleft + Pplright)/2, respectively, where Pleft and Pright are (measured) pressures in the endobronchial airways (under static conditions, Pleft and Pright are also the alveolar pressures), and Pplleft and Pplright are the (unmeasured) pleural pressures in the hemithoraxes. The pressure displacing the mediastinum is simply Pplleft - Pplright. The elastance of lungs, ECW, and compliant dividing structure (EAsym) are defined by the following equations Math1 Math2 Math3 Math4 where Eleft and Eright are the elastances of the left and right lungs, respectively. Rearrangement of the equations above yields expressions for the measured variables in terms of elastances and known volumes Math5 Math6

ECW could not be reliably determined from pressures measured during sequential inflation, so it was found first from tidal volume measured by the anesthesia machine and esophageal pressure excursions during tidal ventilation, assuming that, when the left and right airways are connected together, Pplleft and Pplright are equal to each other and to esophageal pressure. In the first analysis, we used each individual's measured value of ECW, and in the second analysis we used the average value of ECW as an input parameter, and the other elastances were found by minimizing the sum of squared errors of Eqs. 5 and 6 during sequential inflations. (In 2 subjects, the final inflation in the first series was rejected because the lungs were not pneumatically isolated.)


We characterize the mechanics of asymmetric lung inflation by elastance instead of compliance because elastances were distributed over a more limited range than compliances, which included very high values (corresponding to very low elastances). When calculations were based on measured values of ECW (first analysis), EAsym was 13.0 ± 8.7 cmH2O/l (mean ± SD), similar to the elastance of one lung, and ranged from ∼0 to 30 cmH2O/l (Fig. 2A, Table 2). Other elastances were 14.0 ± 7.0 (Eleft), 12.2 ± 6.1 (Eright), and 6.7 ± 2.1 cmH2O/l (ECW). The average EAsym corresponds to a compliance of 77 ml/cmH2O and implies that, if the two lungs were inflated to volumes differing by 1 liter, the Pplleft and Pplright would differ by 6.5 cmH2O.

Fig. 2.

Elastance of asymmetric expansion (EAsym) in 20 subjects from the first analysis, in which values are based on ECW measured in each subject (A), and the second analysis, in which values are based on the average ECW from all subjects (B). *Subjects with prior mediastinal radiation therapy or cardiac surgery, who, as a group, had higher EAsym values than the others (P < 0.01, ANOVA).

View this table:
Table 2.

Elastances of left and right lungs, EAsym, and ECW in all subjects

When calculations were based on the average value of ECW (6.7 cmH2O/l, second analysis), EAsym was 12.6 ± 4.2 cmH2O/l, and other elastances were 14.0 ± 7.0 (Eleft) and 12.2 ± 6.1 cmH2O/l (Eright) (Fig. 2B, Table 2). The average values in the second analysis were nearly identical to those in the first, but the standard deviation of EAsym was only one-half that in the first analysis, suggesting that much of the variation in EAsym among subjects in the first analysis was due to the variation in measured ECW.

One subject with prior cardiac surgery (patient 12) had the highest EAsym value, and two subjects with prior mediastinal radiation therapy (patients 11 and 15) had among the highest four values of EAsym in both the first and second analyses (asterisks in Fig. 2), and the average in these three subjects differed from the rest (P < 0.01, ANOVA).

Critique of methods. The values of EAsym we found were on average similar to the elastance of one lung or ECW; however, there was wide variation among subjects. Possible sources of variation include the use of esophageal pressure measurements and the indirect method of estimating EAsym. Pleural pressure is known to vary over the pleural surface due to gravity and to differences between the unstressed shapes of the lung and its container. Therefore, a single value of pleural pressure, such as that estimated by esophageal pressure, cannot reflect pressure over the entire lung. In this study, we assume that a single value of pleural pressure in each hemithorax is representative of the stresses applied to the lung, determining its volume. This common assumption can be justified by the relative ease with which the lung is deformed by nonuniform surface pressures, so that changes in pressure at different locations over the pleural surface are usually similar during changes in lung volume.

In the first analysis, the model produced estimates of lung ECW and EAsym with coefficients of variation ranging from 0.32 to 0.67, raising the possibility that the model was unable to estimate elastances with precision. However, the model fit the data well, accounting for >97% of the variance in the data in all subjects. Furthermore, parameter estimates were consistent within subjects; EAsym values estimated from the first two serial inflations, last two inflations, and all four inflations were similar in all patients (Fig. 3). The likely source of this variability in EAsym is variation in the value of ECW, which was measured during mechanical ventilation and was used for computation of all other elastances. Small changes in ECW, which ranged from 0.003 to 0.011 with a coefficient of variation of 32%, caused large changes in estimates of other parameters, especially EAsym. Figure 4 illustrates how small changes in the value of ECW cause large changes in the calculated values of the other elastances. Because ECW was calculated from data obtained at different times and with different volumes in both lungs than were the other elastances, the values of ECW used may have been inappropriate. Furthermore, ECW was based on measurements of esophageal pressure, which is subject to artifact in supine subjects (3). This artifact would decrease the apparent value of ECW and thus decrease the calculated value of EAsym. In 10 healthy subjects, we have found that the supine artifact was variable among subjects, resulting in an apparent increase in lung elastance in the supine posture of 16 ± 23% (unpublished observations). In part to avoid variability due to these effects, in the second analysis we used the average ECW value from all subjects for calculation of elastances in each subject. Use of the average ECW reduced the coefficient of variation of EAsym by one-half without substantially changing its average value, suggesting that the average EAsym reflects the average elastic impedance to asymmetric lung inflation in our subjects. Other problems were caused by intermittent failure of separation of the two lungs by the endobronchial tube, which caused rejection of 1/10 of the data from two subjects and may have caused the negative lung elastance in another (Table 2).

Fig. 3.

EAsym values derived from the first 2 serial inflations (•) and the last 2 serial inflations (▴) plotted against those derived from all 4 serial inflations in the first analysis and the line of identity. Partial data yielded consistent estimates of elastance, indicating that the parameter estimates were not much affected by noise in the data.

Fig. 4.

Sensitivity of parameter estimates to the value of ECW. Changes in lung elastance and EAsym caused by a 20% decrease or 25% increase in the value of ECW in the analysis in patient 16, whose elastance values were typical. Modest changes in ECW, which was estimated during mechanical ventilation, caused large changes in the values of all other parameters, which were estimated during asymmetric inflations. ELL and ERL, elastances of left and right lungs, respectively.

Our measurements of EAsym were made acutely and may not predict pressure changes caused by unequal volume displacements that persist longer than a few days. It is likely that prolonged unequal volume displacements, such as after pneumonectomy, cause remodeling of the chest wall and mediastinum, accommodating asymmetric inflation and reducing EAsym. EAsym might also be affected by contraction of skeletal muscle, which makes it stiffer to passive stretch. Thus contraction of the diaphragm during inspiration may reduce displacement of volume from one hemithorax to the other through the abdomen and thus could cause an increase in EAsym.


Pressure changes in one hemithorax displace the mediastinum and chest wall structures to change pressure in the contralateral hemithorax. This communication between the hemithoraxes is of two types. The first type is due to compliant structures between the hemithoraxes that are displaced by pressure differences, allowing transmission of pressures between the two sides. Thus inflation of one lung would tend to increase the contralateral pleural pressure, reducing the inflation of the contralateral lung and promoting asymmetric lung expansion. These compliant structures include the mediastinum and the upper abdominal viscera and diaphragm. Displacements of these structures by gravity can be appreciated in chest roentgenograms of patients in lateral decubitus, in whom the dependent lung is less inflated than in the nondependent lung. Another type of communication between the hemithoraxes is due to mechanical coupling between the left and right sides of the rib cage, tending to equalize expansion of the two hemithoraxes and prevent asymmetric chest expansion. This coupling has an opposite effect, in that a rise in pressure in one hemithorax, by causing expansion of both sides of the chest, lowers pressure in the contralateral hemithorax and promotes symmetric inflation of the lungs. EAsym in our subjects was dominated by the first type of communication, so that asymmetric expansion of one lung caused pressure applied to the contralateral lung to be higher than it would otherwise be. For modeling purposes, we attribute the combined functional contributions of these several structures to a single compliant structure between the hemithoraxes. This vision seems appropriate because there is reason to believe (see below) that the mediastinum is the most compliant and, therefore, the most important of these structures in permitting asymmetric lung inflation. EAsym is probably of negligible importance in the erect normal subject but could be important in determining each lung's ventilation when left and right lungs have markedly different sizes or mechanical properties such as might be expected after lobectomy or single-lung transplantation, or with extensive atelectasis or unilateral emphysema. EAsym may also be important when two similar lungs are subjected to different pleural pressures because of extrapulmonary factors, such as pleural effusion, paralysis of one hemidiaphragm, or gravitational effects in the lateral posture.

Mechanical effects of asymmetric lung inflation have been studied in animals. In dogs with unilateral papain-induced emphysema, Margulies et al. (7) found that the distribution of volume between emphysematous and normal lungs was the same in vivo and in vitro, suggesting that the pleural pressures were equal in the two hemithoraxes, despite asymmetric inflation volumes. That would correspond to an EAsym near zero. Later, Hubmayr and Margulies (4) explored the effects of unilateral lung inflation in dogs and baboons. In dogs, pleural pressure in the two hemithoraxes was estimated indirectly, as in our study, and measured directly via liquid-filled cannulas through the ribs. Both methods showed that, when one lung was inflated, the rise in pleural pressure next to the inflated lung was greater than that in the contralateral hemithorax; the ratio of contralateral to ipsilateral pressure change was ∼0.7. In baboons, the indirect technique showed a corresponding ratio of 0.5. These authors did not estimate EAsym, so we could not compare our results directly with theirs. However, we did estimate the relative changes in pleural pressure in the two hemithoraxes in our subjects, whose EAsym values were near the median, and found ratios of 0.3-0.4. Taken together, these results show a progressive increase in values of left-right pleural pressure difference from dog to baboon to human. We speculate that, from dog to human, the progression to a relatively wider mediastinum and a greater ratio of transverse to dorsoventral thoracic diameters could cause a progressive increase in effective mediastinal stiffness (and perhaps increase the tendency for the expansion of one side of the chest wall to cause symmetric expansion of the other side), thus increasing EAsym.

We had predicted that EAsym would be increased by scarring and fibrosis of the mediastinum. Scarring of the mediastinum is expected after cardiac surgery, and mediastinal fibrosis is a well-recognized late complication of radiation therapy (8). Although limited by sample size, our findings supported our prediction. The three subjects with prior coronary surgery or mediastinal radiation therapy had among the four highest EAsym values. In our model, there are several ways for volume to be displaced from one hemithorax to another, thereby equalizing Pplleft and Pplright. The most compliant pathway is the one through which most of the displacement occurs, and thus it largely determines the elastance of all pathways together. If the mediastinum were not the most compliant pathway determining EAsym, one would have expected that mediastinal stiffening by fibrosis (reducing its compliance) would have had little effect on EAsym. Yet we found that EAsym tended to be higher in subjects suspected of having mediastinal fibrosis and conclude that the mediastinum itself is the most compliant pathway determining the extent of asymmetric lung inflation in humans. A similar conclusion was reached recently by DeGroote et al. (2), who used optical techniques to measure displacements of the chest wall in subjects who had undergone single-lung transplantation for emphysema. During forced vital capacity and maximal breathing maneuvers designed to cause asynchronous, unequal volume changes in healthy transplanted and obstructed emphysematous lungs, the left and right sides of the thorax moved equally and synchronously, leading these investigators to conclude that asymmetric lung volume changes were accommodated by displacements of the mediastinum and not by asymmetric chest wall movements (Estenne M, personal communication).

Unequal lung inflation plays a major role in several complications of thoracic surgery. The most widely recognized is postpneumonectomy syndrome, a potentially fatal complication in which a severe shift of the mediastinum leads to bronchial obstruction and respiratory failure (1). Unequal lung inflation is also observed after single-lung transplantation, where it is thought to affect postoperative lung function (9, 10). To illustrate how different values of EAsym could affect individual lung ventilation and volume, we used a previously published model of respiratory mechanics in patients after single-lung transplantation (6). In this model, left and right lung mechanical characteristics, passive characteristics of the chest wall, and inspiratory muscle function were initially specified by parameters derived from measurements of a patient with severe emphysema. To simulate mechanics after single-lung transplantation, the model was modified by substituting parameters of a healthy lung for those of one emphysematous lung. Ventilation was simulated by specifying a pattern of alternating inspiratory and expiratory muscle activation to simulate hyperpnea such as that in moderate exercise. Figure 5 shows individual lung volume excursions during hyperpnea with EAsym values of 2 and 20 cmH2O/l, which are within the range observed in our subjects. In this model, the more compliant mediastinum (lower EAsym) was easily displaced by the difference in the two pleural pressures, allowing the hypercompliant emphysematous lung and the normally compliant transplanted lung to expand unequally when exposed to nearly the same pleural pressures. Severe expiratory flow limitation in the native emphysematous lung compounded the problem by preventing it from emptying during expiration. With a lower EAsym, the native diseased lung is more hyperinflated and the healthy transplanted lung is less inflated, causing lower expiratory flow rates and tidal volumes in the transplanted lung and 20% less ventilation of both lungs. Relative underinflation of the transplant, whose average volume was 413 ml or 22% lower with the lower EAsym, would make it more prone to atelectasis and ventilation-perfusion abnormalities. This simulation shows how a low value of EAsym could adversely affect ventilatory function in patients after transplantation and raises the question of whether surgery to stiffen the mediastinum could be therapeutic.

Fig. 5.

Simulation showing how EAsym affects ventilatory function in a patient after single-lung transplantation for emphysema. Shown are transplanted lung (Left) and native emphysematous lung (Right) volume excursions during sustained hyperpnea with 2 EAsym values (2 and 20 cmH2O/l). With the lower EAsym (higher compliance), the transplanted lung is smaller and less well ventilated, and total ventilation is 40% less than with the higher elastance.


The authors thank Dr. Joseph Locicero for support with the study and Richard E. Brown for a helpful critique of the manuscript.

Present address of A. Dizner-Golab: Dept. of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Warsaw Medical University, 02-005 Warsaw, Poland.


This work was supported by the Beth Israel Anesthesia Foundation and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant HL-52586.


  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


View Abstract