The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether central command activated regions of the insular cortex, independent of muscle metaboreflex activation and blood pressure elevations. Subjects (n = 8) were studied during 1) rest with cuff occlusion, 2) static handgrip exercise (SHG) sufficient to increase mean blood pressure (MBP) by 15 mmHg, and 3) post-SHG exercise cuff occlusion (PECO) to sustain the 15-mmHg blood pressure increase. Data were collected for heart rate, MBP, ratings of perceived exertion and discomfort, and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) by using single-photon-emission computed tomography. When time periods were compared when MBP was matched during SHG and PECO, heart rate (7 ± 3 beats/min; P < 0.05) and ratings of perceived exertion (15 ± 2 units; P < 0.05) were higher for SHG. During SHG, there were significant increases in rCBF for hand sensorimotor (9 ± 3%), right inferior posterior insula (7 ± 3%), left inferior anterior insula (8 ± 2%), and anterior cingluate regions (6 ± 2%), not found during PECO. There was significant activation of the inferior (ventral) thalamus and right inferior anterior insular for both SHG and PECO. Although prior studies have shown that regions of the insular cortex can be activated independent of mechanoreflex input, it was not presently assessed. These findings provide evidence that there are rCBF changes within regions of the insular and anterior cingulate cortexes related to central command per se during handgrip exercise, independent of metaboreflex activation and blood pressure elevation.
- brain imaging
- single-photon emission computed tomography
- magnetic resonance imaging
- autonomic control
- brain mapping
during exercise, central command signals from the higher brain are thought to converge with afferent signals arising from the working skeletal muscle at medullary centers of cardiovascular integration to yield an overall cardiovascular response in proportion to the intensity of physical activity or perceived effort (5, 9, 23). Both of these mechanisms, central command and muscle afferent input, can act independently to elicit cardiovascular responses, namely elevations in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) (9). Central command and muscle afferent input also interact with baroreflex mechanisms (10). Studies investigating the functional anatomy of central command-induced changes in regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) have identified a network of cortical structures involved, namely the insular cortex (4, 6, 12, 25-27) and anterior cingulate cortex (4, 6, 26, 27). These structures appear to be activated in response to an increased perception of physical effort during exercise when HR and BP are elevated. However, the exercise-mediated increases in BP, as well as skeletal muscle afferent activation, can independently act to alter rCBF within the insular cortex (22, 29).
Although the insular cortex has been implicated in the overall scheme of cardiovascular regulation (3, 14, 18, 19, 21), it can be selectively activated by simple changes in BP (29) and by muscle afferent input (22). Zhang and Oppenheimer (29) recorded firing patterns of both sympathoexcitatory and sympathoinhibitory neuronal units within the insular cortex after administration of phenylephrine (PE) in anesthetized rats. The PE-induced elevations in BP reduced firing of sympathoexcitatory units, whereas firing patterns for sympathoinhibitory units were increased. Waldrop and Iwamoto (22) reported that a group of sympathetic and/or cardiac-related insular neurons responded to muscular contraction, independent of arterial BP changes. These studies raise the possibility that the previously reported central command-related changes in patterns of brain activation may actually be governed by the concomitant changes in BP and/or muscle afferent input during exercise.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether central command activated regions of the insular cortex, independent of muscle metaborelflex input or BP elevations. Because prior studies (11,27) have shown insular activation to be independent of muscle mechanoreflex input, this aspect was not specifically tested within the present study design. To address this question, patterns of brain activation were contrasted between conditions of static handgrip exercise (SHG) (increased central command, metaboreflex activation, BP elevation) and postexercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) with BP sustained at a level to match the exercise BP response (no central command, metaboreflex activation, BP elevation). Because PECO was initiated during the last seconds of SHG, the assumption was made that the magnitude of metaboreflex activation would be similar between conditions. Therefore, with levels of BP and muscle metaboreflex input “matched” between conditions, differences in rCBF would be related to the differences in the level of central command. We hypothesized that there would be regions of the insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex activated only during the exercise condition, presumably by central command.
Additionally, the effect of prior SHG on rCBF distribution was assessed during postexercise recovery without circulatory occlusion. This was done to ensure that there was not a significant temporal lag between the time that exercise was terminated and brain blood flow returned to preexercise resting levels. rCBF distributions were determined for each condition in several cerebral cortical regions by using single-photon-emission computed tomography (SPECT) coregistered with magnetic resonance images (MRI).
Sixteen subjects volunteered to participate in this experiment. All participants provided written, informed consent before participating in this study, which was approved by the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Institutional Review Board and Radiation Safety Committee. The participants were provided information on the research protocols and were randomly assigned to one of two different testing protocols; one protocol involved matching BP between exercise and postexercise circulatory occlusion (n = 8), and the other contrasted preexercise rest with postexercise recovery (n = 8). The subjects included 12 men and 4 women (aged 26 ± 3 yr). All subjects were healthy and normotensive (resting BP < 140/90 mmHg), and no subjects reported any history of neurological or cardiovascular disease. All subjects had abstained from exercise and caffeine for at least 12 h before testing, and none were taking any prescription medications at the time of the investigation. Each subject completed three tests on separate days, as specified by their assigned protocol, with the exception of three subjects. Three subjects, one assigned to the BP-matching protocol and two assigned to the pre- and postexercise recovery protocol only completed 2 days of testing. Subjects were familiarized with all procedures and measurements before any data collection. Poststudy medical examination of individual MRI scans showed no significant abnormalities.
After familiarization procedures, a venipuncture was made in the antecubital vein of the contralateral arm by using a 21-gauge over-the-needle Teflon catheter. The needle was removed, and the catheter was left in place and capped with an injectable site to facilitate the innocuous administration of the retained blood flow tracer. Subjects were seated comfortably in a chair with their nondominant hand positioned at the level of the heart for BP assessment using a Finapres (Ohmeda 2300, Madison, WI). HR and BP data were recorded every 10 s throughout the testing periods. Subjects involved in the protocol that involved cuff occlusion had a pneumatic cuff fitted around the upper arm. We used a handgrip dynamometer (Jamar, Asimow Engineering, Los Angeles, CA) to record each subject's maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), and a 30% MVC value was calculated for reference. After all instrumentation and protocol instructions, subjects were allowed to sit quietly for 10–15 min to establish baseline measurements.
There were two different testing protocols. For the subjects involved in the exercise and postexercise occlusion protocol, the testing protocol involved a resting baseline (with arm cuff inflated), handgrip exercise, and postexercise circulatory occlusion. Each subject performed this protocol three times on different days. A retained brain blood flow tracer was injected during a different portion of the test each time the protocol was performed, either during the rest portion, during the last minute of the handgrip portion, or during the postexercise circulatory occlusion portion. The portion of the test when the blood flow tracer was to be injected was randomized across test days and subjects. The primary goal of this protocol was to elevate mean BP (MBP) during SHG and then sustain the MBP during postexercise conditions (a target of 15 mmHg). For the SHG test, subjects began squeezing the dynamometer at 40% MVC. Depending on their individual MBP responses, subjects were provided verbal feedback to adjust their grip strength so as to achieve the target BP increase. This verbal cueing was continued as needed for 3 min of SHG to ensure that MBP remained within the target region. The brain blood flow tracer was injected during the last minute of exercise when MBP was stable. The verbal cueing was minimal during this last minute of exercise.
A rating of perceived exertion (RPE) was taken every 20 s during the last minute of SHG by using a standard 6- to 20-unit scale (2). For PECO, the SHG was repeated, and an arm cuff was inflated to 250 mmHg during the last few seconds of exercise. Subjects were asked to stop squeezing and remain quiet while MBP was sustained. Over the next 40 s with PECO, HR was allowed to return toward baseline values while MBP was sustained. After 40 s, the brain blood flow tracer was injected, and the cuff remained inflated for an additional minute. A rating of discomfort produced by the arm cuff occlusion was also assessed at the end of each test by using a 10-point category scale.
For subjects involved in the postexercise recovery protocol, the tests involved a resting baseline (no cuff occlusion), handgrip exercise, and postexercise recovery without circulatory occlusion. Each subject performed this protocol three times on different days. A retained brain blood flow tracer was injected during a different portion of the test each time the protocol was performed (either during the rest portion, during the last minute of the SHG portion, or during the postexercise recovery portion). The portion of the test when the blood flow tracer was to be injected was randomized across test days and subjects. The goal of this protocol was to duplicate the SHG, as used in the other protocol, and assess postexercise responses to determine whether the exercise might have an influence on postexercise responses. For the SHG test, subjects again began squeezing the dynamometer at 40% MVC and were provided 3 min of verbal feedback, as needed, to adjust their grip strength so as to achieve and sustain the 15-mmHg target MBP increase. The brain blood flow tracer was again injected at minute 2of the 3-min SHG test. For the postexercise recovery, the exercise protocol was repeated. At the end of SHG, subjects were asked to stop squeezing, relax, and sit quietly. Over the next 40 s, BP and HR were allowed to return toward baseline values. The brain blood flow tracer was then injected, and the subjects sat quietly for an additional minute.
To determine the rCBF distributions during each testing condition, 20 mCi of freshly reconstituted Tc-99m ethylcysteinatedimer (Neurolite, DuPont Pharma, Billerica, MA) was injected intravenously. This retained brain blood flow tracer is a photon emitter with a physical half-life of 6 h. Increases in rCBF to a particular region of the brain subsequently led to an increase in the amount of radioactivity recorded from that region (16). A technician administered the blood flow tracer and flushed the catheter with normal saline. The subjects continued their activity for an additional minute to facilitate appropriate distribution of the tracer. Because their eyes were closed during exercise, subjects were unaware of the exact time of injection and reported no noticeable side effects. All subjects were taken to the SPECT camera room 20 min after exercise, and scanning was completed within 50 min of injection for all subjects. Brain scanning procedures have been previously reported in detail (25).
Image processing and statistical analysis.
Each individual's brain images were aligned in three dimensions by a computer using an automated volume coregistration algorithm widely used for PET-PET coregistration (28). Once the SPECT scans for a given subject were coregistered, normalization of total radioactive count variability was obtained by rescaling each volume so that total counts were equal for all volumes. After SPECT-SPECT coregistration for each individual, SPECT-MR coregistration was obtained by using an interactive coregistration algorithm (8) implemented on the workstation after the SPECT voxel size was made to match the MR voxel size. The absolute and percent count differences for each pixel were obtained between scans. These differences were then displayed for a selected slice within the volume as a color overlay superimposed on the MR.
Specific brain regions and structures were located by using the coregistered MR as an anatomic reference. With the use of the computer, regions of interest (ROI) were drawn around these areas, as seen on the MR slice. This procedure was repeated on contiguous transaxial slices until the entire brain region/structure had been assessed across all slices. The number of 1.5-mm slices assessed varied by specific region and subject but was consistent across subjects.
On the basis of findings from prior human studies involving the insular cortex (4, 6, 14) and the spatial resolution of the SPECT methodology, the relatively large insular regions were divided into smaller divisions for analysis. The right and left insular regions were further subdivided into four equal quadrants on the basis of each individual's anterior-posterior midline (rostral-caudal) through the insula and superior-inferior (dorsal-ventral) midline through the insula. Although nonstandard neuroanatomic descriptors are used, the terminology selected best identifies the specific regions assessed by using standard anatomic planes of reference for human study. Furthermore, these regions are of adequate size so as not to compromise the spatial resolution of the methodology.
The insular quadrants served as ROI for analysis and were termed anterior superior (rostral dorsal), anterior inferior (rostral ventral), posterior superior (caudal dorsal), posterior inferior (caudal ventral), for the right and left sides. Similarly, ROIs were formed from the two halves of the thalamus divided into two equal superior (dorsal) and inferior (ventral) regions. Other regions/structures analyzed, with corresponding Brodmann's areas (BA) approximated when applicable, included dominant and nondominant hand sensorimotor regions (BA 1–4), anterior cingulate cortex (BA 24 and 32), cerebellar vermis, and a white matter region encompassing the anterior corpus callosum.
The total number of radioactive SPECT counts within each ROI was then compared between conditions for each subject as absolute counts and as a percent change from the resting condition. SPECT data were corrected by using white matter rCBF from the resting condition. During the processing and rCBF data assessment, data were coded such that the researchers performing these analyses were blinded with regard to the subject identity, protocol affiliation, and order of experimental conditions.
A univariate analysis was used to assess normality; the data did not show a normal distribution. A Friedman's ANOVA was selected to compare differences in dependent variables at rest, at the third minute of handgrip, and at the last minute of postexercise. If significance was detected, a Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis was performed to determine specific differences for pairwise comparisons. Changes (as percent difference) in brain activation from rest were also compared between exercise and nonexercise conditions by using a Mann-Whitney test for ranked data with a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. The alpha level was set at P < 0.05 for all analyses.
SHG and PECO.
This protocol involved SHG and postexercise circulatory occlusion with similar BP elevations and the assessment of cardiovascular changes and rCBF distribution as radioactive counts within the specific ROIs across conditions. Data for MBP, HR, force (%MVC) and RPE during SHG and perceived pain/discomfort during PECO are presented in Fig.1.
There were significant elevations in MBP from rest during the last minute of SHG (94 ± 7 vs. 108 ± 5 mmHg; P< 0.05). Likewise, MBP remained elevated during PECO (107 ± 5 mmHg), and values did not differ from the last minute of SHG. HR was elevated during the last minute of SHG (7 ± 3.3 beats/min;P < 0.05) and returned to resting levels during PECO. There was a significant decrease in the force required to sustain MBP from the first to last minutes of exercise (39 ± 1 to 24 ± 5% MVC; P < 0.05) even though MBP and HR remained constant over the last minute of exercise. RPE also remained relatively constant at 15 ± 1 units (on a 6–20 point scale) over the last minute of exercise, despite the decrease in force over the same time period. During PECO, subjects rated the perceived level of pain at 2 ± 1 units on a 0–10 point scale.
Changes in cerebral cortical activation across conditions are shown in Table 1. The dominant and nondominant hand sensorimotor regions showed significant increases in activity from rest during SHG at 9 ± 3 and 5 ± 2%, respectively. There was an increase in activation for the anterior cingulate (6 ± 2%) during SHG. The right inferior thalamus showed significant activation during both SHG (15 ± 3%) and PECO (12 ± 3%). Likewise, there was increased activation in the left inferior thalamus for both conditions. Although the right inferior anterior insula was activated during both SHG and PECO, the right inferior posterior insula was activated only during SHG (7 ± 3%). The SHG also elicited activation of the left inferior anterior insula (8 ± 2;P < 0.05), whereas PECO did not produce activation in this region (Fig. 2). There was no significant activation or deactivation for the other cerebral cortical regions assessed.
Rest vs. postexercise recovery.
This protocol involved comparing patterns of brain activation between a preexercise resting period, exercise, and postexercise recovery period (40 s after termination of handgrip) for changes in rCBF distribution as radioactive counts within the specific ROIs across conditions. Data for MBP, HR, force (%MVC), and RPE during SHG were also collected.
There were significant elevations in MBP from preexercise rest during the last minute of SHG (97 ± 8 vs. 110 ± 7 mmHg;P < 0.05). After 40 s of recovery, the postexercise resting MBP was not different from preexercise resting MBP (96 ± 7 vs. 97 ± 8 mmHg). Although HR was elevated during the last minute of SGH (+8 ± 6 beats/min; P < 0.05), values had returned to resting levels during postexercise recovery (68 ± 5 vs. 66 ± 5 beats/min). Similar to the other protocol, there was a significant decrease in the force from the first to last minutes of exercise as needed to achieve a MBP increase of ∼15 mmHg (41 ± 1 to 22 ± 4% MVC; P < 0.05). RPE also remained relatively constant at 15 ± 1 units (on a 6–20 point scale) over the last minute of exercise, despite the decrease in force. During postexercise recovery, subjects rated the perceived level of pain at 1 ± 1 units (on 0–10 point scale).
With respect to changes in cerebral cortical activation across conditions, the dominant and nondominant hand sensorimotor regions showed significant increases in activity from rest during SHG at +8 ± 3% and +5 ± 2%, respectively. However, there were no significant changes from preexercise rest during the postexercise rest. There was an increase in activation for the anterior cingulate (7 ± 3%), but only during SHG. Both the right and left inferior thalamic regions showed significant activation during SHG (+12 ± 3 and +8 ± 3%, respectively). The right inferior anterior insula (+5 ± 2%), right inferior posterior insula (+7 ± 2%), and left inferior anterior insula (+7.5 ± 2) all showed significant activation during SHG. These responses paralleled those observed during SHG for the other protocol. Overall, there were no significant differences for any cerebral cortical regions assessed between preexercise rest and postexercise recovery.
The primary finding of this investigation was that there were distinct regions of the insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex activated during SHG by central command, independent of muscle metaboreflex activation or BP elevations. Regions of the insular cortex and thalamus also showed activation during both handgrip and postexercise circulatory occlusion, suggesting that these specific sites may be related to the muscle afferent input or BP elevations as reported in prior studies (22, 29). When preexercise rest was compared with postexercise recovery without circulatory occlusion, there were no significant differences in rCBF distribution. This indicates that the responses observed during postexercise circulatory occlusion did not result from the preceding exercise bout. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that regions of the insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex can be activated by central command per se. Human studies investigating central command-induced changes in rCBF have consistently reported activity within insular cortex (4, 6, 12, 25-27) and anterior cingulate cortex (4, 6, 26, 27). However, the potentially confounding effects of concomitant BP elevations (29) and muscle afferent input (22) on insular cortex activation had not been previously addressed during exercise in humans.
Central command-related responses.
A goal of this investigation was to uncouple the effects of central command on rCBF from those of BP elevations occurring during exercise. Central command is generally thought to have a greater effect on HR and cardiac output (7, 24) than on BP, with the latter being attributed to a pressor reflex response generated by the contracting skeletal muscle (5, 9). The handgrip force was continually adjusted such that MBP could be elevated by ∼15 mmHg and then sustained, via reductions in force as needed. At the end of SHG, the arm cuff was rapidly inflated to trap the metabolites within the muscle and sustain metaborelfex activation. As shown in Fig. 1, BP elevations were similar between SHG and PECO, suggesting that muscle metaboreflex activation was most likely driving the MBP increases during both conditions. Over the last minute of the SHG with MBP maintained, the RPE remained relatively constant at 15 ± 2 units, indicating that the level of central command was sustained during this period (9). As would be expected with central command activation during SHG, HR was elevated, but returned toward resting levels during PECO (Fig. 1). Thus, with similar activation of muscle metaboreflexes and BP elevation between conditions, differences in patterns of rCBF are likely related to the presence of central command during SHG.
To assess patterns of brain activation within the insular cortex, the right and left insular cortexes were subdivided into four equal quadrants (superior anterior, superior posterior, inferior anterior, inferior posterior) by using standard planes of reference for human study. This was done to determine whether there were more specific regions of central command-induced activation within this relatively large cortical structure than previously reported without compromising the spatial resolution of the SPECT technique. With regards to the functional anatomy of central command per se, the right inferior posterior and left inferior anterior insular regions were activated to a greater extent during exercise, but not during PECO with BP elevated (Fig. 2). In closer examination of data provided by King et al. (6) during a brief bout of SHG, it appears that the right posterior insular region was activated during the handgrip but not immediately postexercise. Critchley et al. (4) also reported activation of the right posterior insular region during handgrip, as well as in response to mental stress. If the classical definition of central command is broadened to one's “sense of effort” independent of actual exercise (26), then a variety of “effortful” tasks (i.e., mental arithmetic) resulting in cardiovascular activity could activate similar cortical networks to elicit cardiovascular responses. Findings of the left inferior anterior activation are consistent with previous work demonstrating a significant correlation with HR (25). It should be noted that activation of the right inferior posterior insular region was also reported to covary with BP (4, 25). However, present data would suggest that this insular activation may be more related to central command or effort sense than to actual changes in BP.
The insular cortex has been implicated in the central modulation of autonomic function with reciprocal connections to limbic structures (3, 18, 19, 21). The primary limbic structure implicated in exercise-related brain activation has been the anterior cingulate cortex (4, 6, 26, 27). Activation of the anterior cingulate was presently observed during SHG, but not during PECO, implicating it in the functional anatomy of central command. Although the anterior cingulate cortex has been shown to be involved in the perceived unpleasantness of painful stimuli (17), the absence of activation during PECO indicates that it did not respond to a metaboreflex stimulus sufficient to drive BP elevations. The rating of perceived pain during PECO was a 2 ± 1 unit on the 0–10 point scale, corresponding to a sensation of being “uncomfortable,” and was well below a “painful” level denoted by a rating of 6 units. This indicates that the metaboreflex activation was not perceived as painful stimuli and that the anterior cingulate activation was likely related to sense of effort or central command.
With regard to a specific role of the anterior cingulate cortex as related to central command, it is largely involved in the discrimination of peripheral somatosensory input. Thus it could serve to interpret an individual's level of central command (or sense of effort or exertion). This region defined as the anterior cingulate cortex by both Critchley et al. (4) and the present study is included within the region termed the medial prefrontal cortex by King et al. (6). They reported that activation of this medial prefrontal region during SHG was associated with cardiovascular activation. Reviews by Cechetto and Saper (3) and Verberne and Owens (21) have defined a significant role for the medial prefontal cortex in cardiovascular regulation, and this area appears to have a role in central command (26, 27). This suggests that the anterior cingulate cortex may function in cooperation with portions of the insular cortex as a “central command network,” functioning to interpret an individual's sense of effort and elicit an appropriate autonomic adjustment to affect cardiovascular responses.
Noncentral command-related responses.
During SHG, hand sensorimotor regions showed significant activation (Table 1), as found in previous work (4, 11, 13,25-27). This sensorimotor region was not activated during postexercise circulatory occlusion, suggesting that it may not have encompassed a significant sensory region for the hand or that the metabolic afferent signals may be integrated in a different region of the brain. Sensorimotor regions are typically activated during exercise with the execution of movement but are not requisite for modulation of cardiovascular responses (27). Nowak et al. (11) have previously concluded that it is unlikely that activation of sensorimotor cortex represents a central command influence on the cardiovascular system.
With regard to common sites of activation between exercise and postexercise circulatory occlusion at similar BP, the thalamus and right inferior anterior insular region showed significant activation. Given the similarity in responses between conditions, these regions are most likely responding to baroreceptor activation (29) and/or muscle afferent input (22). The present study design does not allow for differentiation between these two mechanisms. However, the finding is consistent with data from King et al. (6), who showed right anterior insular activation during SHG, Valsalva's maneuver, and maximal inspiration procedures, during which time BP was elevated.
As noted previously, PE-induced elevations in BP in rats reduced firing of insular sympathoexcitiatory units, whereas firing patterns for sympathoinhibitory units were increased (29). On the basis of the overall distributions of excitatory and inhibitory neurons within the insula, both increases and decreases in insular activity might be expected in response to BP elevations. In the present study, the left inferior posterior insular also showed a tendency for decreased activity when BP was increased, and it has previously been reported that PECO can result in decreased rCBF for the insular cortex (25). Waldrop and Iwamoto (22) located a group of sympathetic and/or cardiac-related insular neurons that responded to muscular contraction. These same neurons showed decreased firing when PE was used to elevate arterial BP. Thus the insular cortex appears to be capable of responding to multiple inputs from arterial baroreceptors, muscle afferents, and central command. Further comparisons regarding activation patterns of the insula between studies is complicated by the potential species differences, coupled with possible anatomic and neurophysiological variations within species.
The thalamus was subdivided into superior (dorsal) and inferior (ventral) portions for right and left sides. There was significant activation of the right and left inferior thalamic regions during both handgrip exercise and postexercise circulatory occlusion. The inferior (or ventral) region of the thalamus presently activated appears to be analogous to the ventroposterior region previously demonstrated to have reciprocal connections with the insular cortex (3, 19) and may be further related to baroreceptor activation (3). BP changes have been show to elicit activation in the thalamus (3,30). Zhang and Oppenheimer (30) determined that a significant portion of baroreceptor-related neurons from the ventrobasal thalamus were reciprocally connected with the posterior insula in the rat. It has been reported that regions of the human ventrocaudal nucleus of the thalamus are involved in the integration of afferent baroreceptor information (15). When directly stimulated, these thalamic regions can elicit increases in HR and BP in humans (20). Taken together with the present findings, regions of the human thalamus appear to have a key role in the overall regulation of BP via baroreflex mechanisms, and further study is needed to better define its specific function.
The cerebral cortical regions identified in this study may not be inclusive of all brain regions involved in the functional anatomy of central command as the spatial resolution of the SPECT technique (∼10–12 mm) does not allow us to assess, with confidence, smaller structures that may also play an important role in cardiovascular regulation, such as midbrain regions. Also, regions of increased or decreased rCBF distribution, relative to a baseline condition, have been identified, but it is not possible to determine the specific type of neural activity (i.e., excitatory or inhibitory) related to these changes in rCBF.
Although a muscle metaboreflex signal may have been similar between conditions of SHG and PECO, it is likely that SHG would produce a greater degree of muscle mechanoreflex activation. It could be suggested that differences in insular activation may be related to this mechanical afferent input; however, prior studiesduring imagined exercise, with no muscle afferent input, activated similar regions of the insular cortex as those presently reported (27). Furthermore, Nowak (13) has reported insular activation during attempted movement in spinal cord injured subjects with no afferent feedback. These findings argue in favor of a central command effect with regard to insular activation as opposed to a muscle mechanoreflex effect. However, these studies cannot definitively rule out a possible role for muscle mechanoreceptor involvement in the observed insular activation.
The insula has also been implicated in an auditory network (1). Thus it is possible that the verbal cueing to squeeze given to some subjects during SHG could have contributed to insular activity. This cueing was only provided as needed, typically once or twice during the last minute of SHG, and was not consistent. It would appear that such cueing would not lead to significant activation of the insular cortex (1), but the possibility of an auditory-related activation cannot be discounted.
Changes in Pco 2 during exercise can alter global cerebral blood flow; however, we would not expect significant changes in Pco 2 during the SHG used. Although no direct measures of Pco 2 were made, the rCBF data were corrected for the small white matter flow changes (+2 ± 1%) that reflect global cerebral blood flow. Novel information regarding patterns of cerebral cortical activation has been provided for one level of BP change (∼15 mmHg), but it is not clear whether the present findings can be extrapolated for higher (or lower) BP changes.
In conclusion, findings from this investigation show distinct regions of the right and left insular cortexes and the anterior cingulate cortex activated during SHG, presumably by central command. Although prior (13, 27) studies have demonstrated insular activation independent of the muscle mechanoreflexes, the present study design does not eliminate the possible involvement of muscle mechanoreceptor input. There were also regions of the insular cortex and thalamus activated during both exercise and postexercise circulatory occlusion, most likely responding to muscle metaboreflex activation and/or BP elevations resulting in arterial baroreceptor activation. When postexercise recovery without circulatory occlusion was compared with preexercise rest, there were no significant differences in rCBF. Thus regions of the insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex appear to play a significant role in neural circuitry of central command. Future investigations must be performed to more clearly define the sites of signal integration for central command, muscle afferent input, and arterial baroreflex mechanisms.
We thank the subjects for cooperation and also acknowledge the expert technical assistance of Reza Sadoogh, Shawn Shotzman, and Amber Shepard at Zale Lipshy University Hospital and Jerri Payne at the Mary Nell and Ralph B. Rogers MRI Center, Dallas, Texas.
This study was supported by an American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid from the Texas Affiliate, no. 0050726Y (to J. W. Williamson) and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant R01 HL-59145-03 (to J. W. Williamson).
Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. W. Williamson, UT Southwestern Allied Health Sciences School, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-8876 (E-mail:).
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
First published January 31, 2003;10.1152/japplphysiol.01152.2002
- Copyright © 2003 the American Physiological Society