Journal of Applied Physiology

Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and the metabolic syndrome in youth

Rebekah M. Steele, Soren Brage, Kirsten Corder, Nicholas J. Wareham, Ulf Ekelund


The metabolic syndrome is defined as the coexistence of multiple cardiovascular and diabetes risk factors, the prevalence of which has increased dramatically in adult populations in the last decades. More recently, the same cluster of metabolic risk factors has also been recognized in children and adolescents. Epidemiological evidence suggests that high levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and physical activity are associated with a favorable metabolic risk profile in adults. However, in youth the role of these factors is less clear. Therefore, the purpose of this mini-review is to examine the recent evidence between objectively measured habitual physical activity and CRF with clustered metabolic risk in youth. In general, it appears that both physical activity and CRF are separately and independently associated with metabolic risk factors in youth, possibly through different causal pathways. Further research is necessary to quantify how much physical activity is needed to prevent the metabolic syndrome and the diseases with which it is associated. Public health approaches that encourage increased physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviors may prove useful in reducing the population burden associated with metabolic risk.

  • children
  • adolescents
  • objective measurement
  • sedentary behavior

the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome has dramatically increased over the last few decades and has become a major health challenge worldwide, increasing the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), Type 2 diabetes (T2D), nonalcoholic liver disease, renal disease, and some forms of cancer in adults (73, 76). The metabolic syndrome may be defined as the clustering of three or more of the following risk factors: adiposity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, low high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, and high triglycerides. Until recently, metabolic risk factor clustering had only been reported in adults. However, observations of single risk factors as well as multiple-clustered risk factors have now been observed in children and adolescents (44, 64). Although definitions of clustered metabolic risk in adults vary across different health advisory boards (2, 3, 39), a recent International Diabetes Federation consensus report defines the syndrome in children and adolescents as central obesity plus any two of a raised triglyceride level, a reduced HDL-cholesterol level, hypertension, and elevated fasting plasma glucose (75).

The emergence of the metabolic syndrome parallels the rising rates of overweight and obesity observed in youth worldwide (57, 64). Prevalence figures of the metabolic syndrome in young people vary between 0 and 60% depending on the definition of the metabolic syndrome and the population examined, with the highest prevalence figures observed in obese youth (44, 64). However, only a few studies have assessed the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in representative population-based samples of children and adolescents. Data from these studies suggest that the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome varies between 3 and 12% in representative samples of youth (17, 19, 22, 49, 59). However, lack of a universal definition of metabolic syndrome in these studies limits the generalizability, diagnosis, and clinical utility for therapeutic intervention, as well as the ability to compare prevalence rates across countries and studies.

Sedentary behavior, persistent low levels of physical activity, and poor cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) are known to predict progression toward CVD, T2D, and metabolic syndrome in adults (9, 21, 33, 53, 62). A recent review by Ford and Li (33), outlined the evidence from a diverse range of cross-sectional and prospective studies, identifying the influence of physical activity and CRF on the metabolic syndrome in adults. Physical activity and CRF may also be associated with metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents (24, 35, 37). Evidence also suggests that sedentary behavior, low levels of physical activity, and CRF in youth track into adulthood, (35, 54, 74); likewise metabolic risk factors also appear to track over time (16, 52), and this may predispose young people to disease in later in life (42).

In this review, we describe the recent epidemiological evidence of the relationship between habitual physical activity and CRF with clustered metabolic risk with emphasis on recent studies (from 2004 onward) that have employed objective measures of physical activity and CRF. As a consequence, a few large studies using self-reported physical activity (51, 56, 60) are excluded. In addition, our focus here is on habitual physical activity and not specifically exercise, so we have also excluded exercise training studies, most of which have been conducted in nonrepresentative populations such as overweight or obese children. A thorough discussion of the biological plausibility is beyond the scope of this review, so we restrict our focus to describing the direction and magnitude of association. We begin this review with the operational definitions of physical activity and CRF and a brief overview of the merits and limitations of using nondichotomized scores for defining metabolic health in youth. We then review the association between physical activity, sedentary behavior, CRF, and clustered metabolic risk, and we discuss the mediating role of obesity. Finally, we provide a summary of current physical activity recommendations for children and adolescents.


The term “physical activity” is often used interchangeably with energy expenditure, exercise, and physical fitness. These terms have been defined by Caspersen et al. (15) with “physical activity” as “any bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that results in energy expenditure” and “physical fitness” as a “set of attributes either health- or skill related” that is not synonymous with physical activity. “Exercise” on the other hand is “a subset of physical activity that is planned, structured, and repetitive” leading to the improvement or maintenance of physical fitness. In this review, we refer to fitness almost exclusively as CRF or endurance-related fitness, which relates very closely to maximal capacity for oxygen consumption. An important distinction between physical activity and CRF is the intraindividual day-to-day variability; physical activity will undoubtedly vary on a daily basis, whereas CRF will remain relatively static, taking time to change. This variability will impact on the ability to measure these two quantities and consequently will influence the ability to demonstrate their relationship with metabolic outcomes. Figure 1 conceptualizes the role of physical activity and CRF in the etiology of metabolic syndrome and CVD risk.

Fig. 1.

Conceptual model illustrating physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and its associations with metabolic risk and future disease progression. Dashed lines represent the hypothesized mediating effect between phenotypes and metabolic risk, solid lines represent direct effect.


Opinions differ as to whether the clustering of metabolic risk factors is truly a syndrome (50) and whether reducing a complex cluster to a binary category has either clinical utility in altering therapy or etiological value in producing enhanced understanding about causation. In adult populations, some have argued that insulin resistance is the central feature (55), whereas others state that central or upper body obesity are key features (41). Insulin resistance, central obesity, and systemic inflammation are interrelated and generally coexist in individuals with increased risk of CVD. The link between obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic risk has been described in children and adolescents (67). Despite some inconsistencies in the definition and lack of a universal acceptance of the metabolic syndrome, the central message is that the presence of one or multiple risk factors of any type in youth should be cause for concern. In fact, one may broaden this concern to include any worsening of multiple features of the metabolic syndrome, even if they do not exceed established clinical thresholds.

The dichotomization of the metabolic syndrome may be useful in clinical diagnosis. However, given the relatively low prevalence of metabolic syndrome in youth, and the fact that these risk factors are correlated with each other both in terms of their level and rate of change over time (16) and therefore may manifest as disease later in life, it may be more relevant to view the metabolic syndrome as a continuously distributed risk score. Moreover, the risk of CVD and T2D increases progressively with higher levels of each individual risk factor and dichotomization reduces the predictive and statistical power to observe associations between exposures and outcomes (58). We and others have therefore focused on using a clustered risk score (summarized Z score) for investigating associations between physical activity, CRF, and metabolic risk (e.g., Refs. 4, 25, 28, 61). A Z score is computed as the number of standard deviation (SD) units from the sample mean after normalization of the variable [i.e., Z = (value − mean)/SD]. This is done for each risk factor and then summed up to denote clustered metabolic risk. Other scoring techniques include principle component analysis, which may provide added methodological utility (71).

Limitations to the use of a summarized metabolic risk score include 1) that it may in fact obscure the true associations between physical activity, CRF, and individual risk factors, 2) that it is specific to the sample populations from which it was derived, and 3) that it is based on the assumption that each component is equally weighted in predicting future disease progression, although this limitation could be addressed with appropriate optimization techniques (34).


Studies in adults have shown that higher levels of physical activity predict slower progression toward the metabolic syndrome in apparently healthy men and women (29, 53), an association that is independent of change in body fatness and CRF (31). Population studies focusing on these relationships in children and adolescents are limited, and the use of self-reported activity, which is more imprecise in children, tends to attenuate the associations observed. More precise methods of measuring physical activity utilizing objective measurement (e.g., accelerometry) are necessary to accurately establish the dose-response relationships between physical activity and its subdimensions (e.g., time spent at different intensity levels of physical activity) with metabolic health outcomes in youth.

In recent years, only a handful of studies have examined the association between physical activity and clustered metabolic risk using objective measures of physical activity (Table 1). Although most of the studies published have used a standardized risk score, the absolute definition varies across studies. For example, one study included the homeostasis model assessment score (the product of fasting glucose and insulin divided by a constant) and CRF in the clustered risk score (4), whereas others have used individual measures of insulin and glucose (e.g., Refs. 12, 28). Different measures of obesity (e.g., waist circumference or sum of skinfolds) have been included, and the risk score has also been defined with and without an obesity measure (e.g., Refs. 30, 63).

View this table:
Table 1.

Associations between objectively measured physical activity and clustered metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents

In a sample of overweight and nonoverweight Hispanic children, Butte et al. (14) showed that the number of metabolic risk factors was inversely associated with total physical activity as well as the number of physical activity bouts of at least 5 min of moderate to vigorous-intensity physical activity performed per day as measured by wrist accelerometry. These associations were independent of age, sex, and standardized body mass index (BMI) score. In the European Youth Heart Study (EYHS) cohort, Andersen et al. (4) showed a graded inverse association between physical activity quintiles measured by hip accelerometry, and clustered metabolic risk. The highest risk was observed in the lowest three quintiles of physical activity. Time spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity [≥2,000 counts/min, approximately equal to walking at 4 km/h (13)], was between 34 and 38 min in the least active quintile and increased to 167–131 min/day in the most active quintile. These observations did not differ by obesity level (i.e., across BMI categories).

In an earlier EYHS study using only the Danish cohort of 9- to 10-yr-old children, physical activity was also shown to be inversely associated with clustered metabolic risk (11). The influence of varying intensity levels of physical activity [i.e., time (min/day) spent at light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity physical activity] may in fact be differentially associated with metabolic risk. Ekelund et al. (28) observed inverse associations between total physical activity, as well as each subdimension of physical activity including time spent in light, moderate, and vigorous physical activity, in 9- and 15-yr-old youth for clustered metabolic risk, independent of CRF. The strength of the association was stronger for total physical activity compared with time spent at moderate- to-vigorous-intensity physical activity. In a similar but smaller study in Sweden, Rizzo et al. (61) found that vigorous physical activity was associated with nonobesity clustered metabolic risk in 15-yr-old girls. However, the association was attenuated after further adjustment for adiposity and CRF. Unfortunately, the magnitude of the association was not reported, and comparison across intensity domains could not be determined. Further research investigating the influence of physical activity intensity on clustered metabolic risk is warranted.


The association between sedentary behavior and metabolic health has also been explored. In adult studies where sedentary behavior has been defined by sitting time or general screen time (i.e., time spent television viewing and/or computer, video game use), associations with individual components of metabolic risk and the metabolic syndrome have been observed (1, 23, 32). The associations of television viewing and objectively measured physical activity by hip accelerometry, with individual and clustered metabolic risk factors, were examined in a large population-based sample from EYHS (30). The positive association between television viewing and clustered metabolic risk was only of borderline significance, after adjustment for physical activity and other confounding factors. However, these associations were explained by a positive association between television viewing and adiposity. In contrast, physical activity was independently and inversely associated with systolic and diastolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin and triglycerides, and nonobesity clustered risk score, independent of obesity and other confounders. Similarly, objectively measured time spent in sedentary behavior (28) has also been shown to be positively and independently associated with clustered metabolic risk, in the same cohort.

Television viewing may not be a good marker of sedentary behavior in children, because associations observed between television viewing, obesity, and metabolic risk may be confounded or mediated by other behaviors, such as snacking while watching television.

The introduction of new generation technology games (i.e., Dance Dance Revolution, Konmami Computer Entertainment; Nintendo Wii) may result in higher energy expenditure compared with traditional sedentary-based computer games, although it appears the intensity of these games may not necessarily contribute toward recommendations for daily physical activity (38). Furthermore, the amount of energy expended during these games may decrease with increasing skills. However, with increasing interest in the inactivity physiology paradigm (physiological, medical, and public health impact of too much sedentary time), more research examining the effect of reducing overall sedentary time, breaking bouts of sedentary time, and increasing nonexercise activity on the metabolic profile of inactive populations is warranted (40).

Based on the limited number of studies available examining the dose-response association between subcomponents of physical activity and metabolic risk in youth, it appears that both reducing time spent sedentary and increasing overall physical activity and time spent at moderate and vigorous intensity may have beneficial effects on metabolic risk in healthy youth.


The degree to which adjustment for adiposity attenuates or modifies the association between physical activity and metabolic risk varies across studies. In general, physical activity is independently associated with clustered metabolic risk after adjusting for adiposity, and it appears that adiposity neither completely mediates nor confounds the associations between physical activity and nonobesity clustered risk. For example, when level of adiposity is excluded from the risk score and adjusted for as a covariate, the magnitude of the association between physical activity and the nonobesity metabolic risk tends to remain unchanged in some studies (11, 28), but it is attenuated in others (61).

Attenuation may be interpreted as evidence of confounding, although it is equally possible that this may suggest a mediating effect of adiposity, because this factor may lie on the causal pathway between physical activity and metabolic health. The different stability of the variables is relevant to an evaluation of potential confounding and mediation. For example, physical activity may detectably impact on variables such as fasting glucose and blood lipids, whereas no effect would be observed for adiposity, which is likely to be the result of long-term balance or imbalance between energy expenditure and intake. However, long-term effects of physical activity on other risk factors could plausibly exist. Moreover, different degrees of measurement precision in the assessment of adiposity and physical activity may also explain attenuation of results and variation between studies.


In general, studies examining the association between CRF and clustered metabolic risk in youth report an inverse relationship, such that as CRF increases, the risk of an unfavorable metabolic risk profile is reduced. A more diverse range of populations have been investigated compared with studies that have only assessed physical activity, and measures of CRF have included both maximal and submaximal tests, bike and treadmill tests, and various field running tests (Table 2).

View this table:
Table 2.

Associations between cardiorespiratory fitness and clustered metabolic risk factors in children and adolescents

In a large sample of 9- and 15-yr olds, CRF was inversely associated with clustered metabolic risk (5). Odds ratios for the relationship between age- and sex-specific quartiles of CRF assessed by a maximal bike test and the clustering of metabolic risk factors was 10.4 for girls and 15.8 for boys in lowest quartile of CRF compared with those in the highest quartile. Expressing CRF from a maximal bike test as watts per unit of fat-free mass (FFM), Ekelund et al. (28) showed significant inverse associations between CRF and clustered metabolic risk with and without adiposity. Similarly after normalization for body weight or FFM, Shaibi et al. (66) also showed that CRF was inversely associated with the number of risk factors present in a Latino population. Ruiz et al. (63) showed an inverse association between CRF (ml·kg−1·min−1) and clustered metabolic risk in 9- and 10-yr old Swedish and Estonian children. Similarly, in Swedish 9- and 15-yr olds, an inverse association of CRF with clustered metabolic risk was observed across age-sex groups (61). However, excluding obesity from the outcome and controlling for body fat as a covariate attenuated the association.


It is difficult to determine whether adiposity confounds, mediates, or modifies the association between CRF and metabolic health. Interpretation of the magnitude of association between CRF and metabolic risk depends on how the exposures and outcome are measured and expressed, and most studies have expressed CRF in relation to body weight, which is strongly related to adiposity. Normalization by body weight may “overcorrect” for differences in body size between individuals and test duration for indirect CRF tests involving weight-bearing activity may underestimate maximal oxygen consumption in heavier children (6), whereas the converse may be true for a bicycle test. When adiposity is also a part of the outcome, there is a risk of creating statistical artifacts in the subsequent adjustment for adiposity. One way to overcome this is to remove adiposity from the outcome and normalize CRF by FFM. Indeed, Ekelund et al. (28) found that the association between CRF per kilogram of FFM and metabolic risk was still apparent, although attenuated, after adjustment for adiposity. This then suggests that confounding is unlikely to explain all of the association, or alternatively that only some of the effect of CRF on clustered metabolic risk is mediated by adiposity.

Another way to examine effect mediation is by stratification. Building on previous studies, Eisenmann et al. (26) showed that children and adolescents with high percent body fat and high CRF have better metabolic risk profiles than those classified as high fat but low CRF. A linear relationship was evident in each of the four cross-tabulated groups of CRF and fatness with the metabolic risk score. In another study, Eisenmann et al. (27) reported that in 8- to 18-yr olds, there was a significant difference in metabolic risk scores across four fitness-fatness groups in male subjects and a trend for significance in females. Although high CRF did not completely remove the risk associated with high BMI on clustered metabolic risk, the study did show an attenuation of the association between BMI and clustered risk after adjustment for CRF. DuBose et al. (20) also showed that BMI was positively and CRF negatively associated with clustered metabolic risk. Clustered metabolic risk varied across fitness-fatness groups, where high CRF appeared to attenuate the metabolic risk score within BMI categories. These studies support the protective role of CRF across levels of obesity, therefore also in obese youth, although the magnitude of the associations appears to be small to moderate.


Earlier studies examining the cross-sectional and prospective effects of both CRF and physical activity on metabolic risk in adulthood have relied on self-report measures of physical activity and a comparably stronger objective measure of CRF. Such studies tend to show associations for metabolic risk with CRF but not physical activity. For example, the Amsterdam Growth and Health Longitudinal study showed that CRF but not self-reported physical activity in adolescence was inversely related to CVD risk factors in adulthood (32 yr), (70). Similarly, the Muscatine Study showed an inverse association between changes in CRF and CVD risk factors from childhood to adolescence; however, no associations were found for self-reported physical activity (48). This is in line with findings in 460 Spanish adolescents, in whom no association was found between self-reported physical activity and a standardized lipid-metabolic risk score (triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and glucose) but an inverse relationship for CRF and metabolic risk was observed for males, independent of physical activity (36). Studies using objective measures of both physical activity and CRF, however, tend to demonstrate independent roles of both physical activity and CRF with metabolic health.

In 301 Danish 9-yr olds (11), CRF and accelerometry-measured physical activity were both inversely related to clustered metabolic risk but only independently so for physical activity when excluding adiposity from the standardized clustered risk score and adjusting for it as a confounder. Furthermore, a significant interaction between physical activity and CRF was observed, suggesting that CRF may modify the association between physical activity and metabolic health in such a way that the effect of physical activity may be stronger amongst children with low CRF. In a larger sample, Ekelund et al. (28) found independent inverse associations of physical activity and CRF with clustered metabolic risk. The relationship between physical activity and clustered risk was similar in magnitude as that observed for CRF after adjustment for body fatness. The association between CRF with clustered risk was partly mediated by adiposity, whereas the association between physical activity and clustered risk was independent of adiposity. Conversely, a smaller Swedish study showed that physical activity did not exert an independent effect on clustered metabolic risk after controlling for CRF (61). Differences between studies may be explained by different sample sizes, which affect the power to detect associations, and different ways of expressing CRF as discussed previously.

CRF is partly influenced by genetic factors (10) and by regular exercise. However, the association between CRF and physical activity appears to be weak in population-based studies in children (28, 45). This may then suggest that physical activity and CRF influence metabolic risk through separate pathways or that CRF is a marker for specific muscle characteristics, for example, muscle fiber-type composition, which may affect metabolic health. Indeed, insulin-stimulated glucose transport (18) and expression of the insulin-regulated glucose transporter GLUT4 maybe muscle fiber specific (18), and others have suggested that slow-twitch muscle fibers are associated with increased lipid oxidation (69).

For the most part, there are a limited number of studies using sufficiently precise measures of physical activity to determine whether CRF or physical activity is a more important determinant of metabolic disease risk. Physical activity is difficult to measure accurately, and limitations are often amplified in youth, partly due to the intermittent nature of their physical activity compared with adults and problems with the accurate self-reporting of physical activity by youth (7, 65). Consequently, weak associations between physical activity and metabolic risk previously observed are likely to be at least partly due to the use of self-report methods to assess physical activity. In general, inaccurate measurement with nondifferential error leads to an underestimation of the true association between an exposure and an outcome in epidemiological studies (72). Regardless of different levels of measurement precision in assessing the two exposures, both physical activity and CRF are associated with metabolic disease risk. Some could regard the statistically significant but relatively weak associations between physical activity, CRF and metabolic disease risk summarized in this review as clinically insignificant. However, all observed associations are from studies including healthy children, and because metabolic risk factors track over time, it would appear that regular participation in physical activity and improvements in CRF may result in substantial reductions of disease occurrence in later in life (8).


Recent studies using more precise quantification of the exposures suggest that both physical activity and CRF are separately and independently associated with metabolic risk factors in children, but possibly through different pathways. Further research using accurate measurements of both exposure and outcome are necessary to further investigate these relationships in youth. Evidence that physical activity and CRF develop early in life and track into adulthood suggests that reducing sedentary behavior and increasing overall physical activity in youth is a potential strategy to overcoming the emerging population burden associated with metabolic cardiovascular disease risk.

From a public health perspective, associations between increasing levels of physical activity and metabolic risk factors that are independent of CRF and fatness are important. First, encouraging small incremental increases in physical activity may be more feasible at a population level, but this may not necessarily improve CRF. Second, increasing levels of habitual physical activity may confer benefits even if fat mass is not changed. For example in adults, physical activity does not appear to significantly contribute to weight loss, but it has an important role in the maintenance of weight loss (43). The minimal and optimal amount of physical activity required to prevent the clustering of metabolic risk in children are unknown. With the absence of direct evidence due to the lack of longitudinal population-based studies using objective measures of physical activity and large-scale randomized controlled trials, current guidelines of at least 60 min/day of moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity may be reasonable. These are consistent with current evidence of the effects of physical activity on general health and behavioral outcomes (46, 68). However, higher levels of physical activity may be required (4). Further research is warranted to quantify how much physical activity is needed to prevent the metabolic syndrome and how much is required to reduce the risk in those who already have unfavorable but subclinical levels in one or more features of the syndrome.


View Abstract