Ghrelin is an orexigenic hormone secreted from endocrine cells in the stomach and other tissues. Acylation of ghrelin is essential for appetite regulation. Vigorous exercise induces appetite suppression, but this does not appear to be related to suppressed concentrations of total ghrelin. This study examined the effect of exercise and feeding on plasma acylated ghrelin and appetite. Nine male subjects aged 19–25 yr participated in two, 9-h trials (exercise and control) in a random crossover design. Trials began at 0800 in the morning after an overnight fast. In the exercise trial, subjects ran for 60 min at 72% of maximum oxygen uptake between 0800 and 0900. After this, they rested for 8 h and consumed a test meal at 1100. In the control trial, subjects rested for 9 h and consumed a test meal at 1100. Area under the curve values for plasma acylated ghrelin concentration (assessed from venous blood samples) were lower over the first 3 h and the full 9 h of the exercise trial compared with the control trial: 317 ± 135 vs. 510 ± 186 pg·ml−1·3 h and 917 ± 342 vs. 1,401 ± 521 pg·ml−1·9 h (means ± SE) respectively (P <0.05). Area under the curve values for hunger (assessed using a visual scale) were lower over the first 3 h of the exercise trial compared with the control trial (P = 0.013). These findings demonstrate that plasma acylated ghrelin concentration and hunger are suppressed during running.
ghrelin is a 28-amino acid peptide hormone that stimulates the release of growth hormone from the pituitary (29). Ghrelin is secreted primarily from cells within the stomach, but ghrelin is synthesized and secreted in many other tissues, including the small intestine, pancreas, hypothalamus, cardiomyocytes, chondrocytes, and placenta (9, 30). Plasma ghrelin concentrations rise before meals and decrease following meals, suggesting that ghrelin is orexigenic (appetite stimulating) (12, 13). This suggestion is supported by the findings that intracerebroventricular ghrelin administration stimulates feeding in rats (37, 51) and that intravenous ghrelin infusion increases food intake in humans (16, 50).
Several studies have investigated the influence of high-intensity aerobic exercise bouts on plasma ghrelin concentration (7, 14, 24, 25, 32, 43, 49). Most of these studies indicate that a single session of aerobic exercise has no influence on ghrelin concentrations (7, 14, 24, 25, 32, 43), although one study reported that serum ghrelin levels are suppressed for up to an hour after the cessation of exercise (49). In contrast, one study has reported that plasma ghrelin concentrations are increased during 3 h of moderate-intensity exercise, but it is uncertain whether this is a true effect of exercise because this study did not include a control trial (11). Furthermore, fasting ghrelin concentrations appear to be unaffected by exercise training in the absence of concurrent weight loss (33). This indicates that ghrelin may be a sensor of negative energy balance as suggested previously (41).
A limitation of research concerning exercise and ghrelin is that all of the studies performed so far have measured total ghrelin (7, 11, 14, 24, 25, 32, 43, 49). Ghrelin exists in nonacylated and acylated forms with the majority (80–90%) being nonacylated (22, 23). Acylation is thought to be essential for ghrelin to bind to the growth hormone-secretagogue receptor and to cross the blood-brain barrier (29, 36). In humans nonacylated ghrelin does not possess the pituitary and pancreatic activity of acylated ghrelin (6). Therefore, nonacylated ghrelin is considered to be unimportant for appetite regulation, although it may have other functions such as inhibiting cell proliferation (10) and stimulating adipogenesis (48).
Relatively few studies have measured acylated ghrelin because it is less stable than total ghrelin (23), creating practical difficulties in sample collection and processing. Two studies have shown that acylated ghrelin is suppressed after mixed meals and provide evidence that macronutrient composition may affect the extent of this suppression (1, 17). Three studies have simultaneously measured acylated and total ghrelin responses to food consumption (2, 34, 23). These studies have confirmed that acylated ghrelin is suppressed after food intake, and one of these studies found that acylated ghrelin responds more rapidly and dynamically than total ghrelin in response to glucose ingestion (23). In view of this latter finding and bearing in mind that appetite is suppressed following exercise (26, 27), we decided to reinvestigate the influence of exercise on ghrelin by specifically measuring acylated ghrelin.
Therefore, the primary purpose of the present study was to determine plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations and hunger ratings during and following an intense bout of treadmill running. We hypothesized that intense treadmill running would cause a temporary suppression of hunger and that this would be associated with reduced concentrations of plasma acylated ghrelin. We also assessed the acylated ghrelin response to feeding because limited information is available in this regard. Finally, we measured the concentrations of plasma glucose and insulin during and after exercise and feeding because glucose and insulin have suppressive effects on ghrelin and are therefore important for ghrelin regulation (19, 35, 44).
After approval from the University Ethical Advisory Committee, nine healthy Caucasian male subjects aged 19–25 yr gave their written informed consent to participate in this study. Most of the volunteers were sports science students studying at Loughborough University. All participants were physically active, and most were involved in competitive sports such as soccer, rugby, tennis, and hockey. Prior training status was not a prerequisite for the study, but the physical demands of the study ensured that all of the subjects were reasonably fit. The physical characteristics of the subjects (means ± SE) were as follows: age 21.2 ± 0.7 yr, height 1.81 ± 0.02 m, body mass 72.6 ± 2.0 kg, body mass index (BMI) 22.2 ± 0.7 kg/m2, waist circumference 78.3 ± 1.7 cm, maximum oxygen uptake 63.3 ± 2.0 ml·kg−1·min−1 (4.56 ± 0.09 l/min).
Before the main trials, each subject attended the laboratory for a preliminary session in which anthropometric data (height, weight, waist circumference) were collected, and two preliminary exercise tests were performed as follows: 1) submaximal-incremental treadmill running test and 2) maximum oxygen uptake treadmill running test. There was a 20- to 30-min rest interval between the exercise tests. After the preliminary session, subjects were given at least a week to recover from the exercise testing before the main trials began. There were two main trials (exercise and control), and these were performed in a randomized order. The exercise trial involved a 1-h run followed by an 8-h rest period while the control trial involved 9 h of rest. A meal was consumed 3 h after the start of each trial, and blood samples were collected throughout each trial for the determination of plasma acylated ghrelin, glucose, and insulin concentrations. In addition, hunger ratings were recorded at intervals throughout each trial using a visual scale.
Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a stadiometer (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Weight was measured to the nearest 0.01 kg using a balance-beam scale (Avery, Birmingham, UK). BMI was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters. Waist circumference was determined as the widest part of the torso between the xiphoid process of the sternum and the iliac crest.
Submaximal-incremental treadmill running test.
After treadmill familiarization, subjects completed a submaximal-incremental treadmill running test to determine the relationship between running speed and oxygen consumption while running on a level motorized treadmill (RUNRACE, Technogym, Gambettola, Italy). The test was designed to exercise subjects through a range of intensities from moderate to vigorous but not maximum. The test was 16 min in duration and was continuous in nature but was divided into four, 4-min stages. The initial running speed was set between 7 and 8 km/h depending on each subject's fitness level. Treadmill speed was increased by 1 or 1.5 km/h at the end of each 4-min period depending on each subject's fitness level. Expired air samples were collected into Douglas bags for the final minute of each 4-min stage for the determination of oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production. Four-minute stages were used to ensure that subjects were in steady state during expired air collection periods. Heart rate was monitored continuously throughout the test using short-range telemetry (model A3, Polar, Kempele, Finland). Ratings of perceived exertion (5) were assessed simultaneously with the expired air collections during the tests. At the end of the test, the oxygen consumption at each stage was plotted against the running speed at each stage to illustrate the running speed-oxygen consumption relationship.
Maximum oxygen uptake test.
Subjects were given 20–30 min to recover from the submaximal treadmill test before they began the maximum oxygen uptake test. Maximum oxygen uptake was measured directly using an incremental uphill protocol at a constant speed until the subjects reached volitional fatigue (46). The test was designed so that subjects would reach volitional fatigue within 10–12 min as recommended by Taylor et al. (46). The initial incline of the treadmill was set at 3.5%. Thereafter, treadmill gradient was increased by 2.5% every 3 min. Thus treadmill incline was 3.5% during minutes 1–3, 6% during minutes 4–6, 8.5% during minutes 7–9, and 11% during minutes 10-12. Expired air samples were collected into Douglas bags between minutes 1:45 and 2:45 of each 3-min stage and during the final minute of the test which occurred when subjects signaled that they could only continue for an additional 1 min. Heart rate was monitored throughout these tests using short-range telemetry (model A3, Polar). Ratings of perceived exertion (5) were assessed simultaneously with the expired air collections during each test.
At the end of the maximum oxygen uptake test, oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were determined from each expired air sample and the highest value was accepted as the maximum oxygen uptake. Criteria used to confirm a true maximum value included two or more of the following: 1) heart rate within ± 10 beats/min of age-predicted maximum heart rate, 2) a respiratory exchange ratio value ≥1.15, 3) a plateau in oxygen consumption. Once maximum oxygen uptake was determined, the oxygen consumption (ml·kg−1·min−1) representing 75% of maximum oxygen uptake was calculated. This value was used together with the data obtained in the submaximal-incremental test to estimate the running speed (during level running) eliciting 75% of maximum oxygen uptake. This running speed was used in the main trial.
Throughout the day before the first main trial, participants weighed and recorded their food intake. Participants then replicated this food intake during the day before the second main trial. Participants were asked to remain inactive and to avoid caffeine and alcohol consumption in the 24 h before each main trial. On the mornings of the main trials, participants arrived at the laboratory having fasted for a minimum of 10 h (no food or drink except water).
Participants were given at least 1 wk to recover from the preliminary exercise tests before performing two main trials (exercise and control), in a random, crossover design with an interval of at least 7 days between trials. Each main trial began in the morning at ∼0800 and lasted for 9 h (until 1700). At the start of the exercise trial, participants ran on the treadmill for 60 min (0800–0900) at a running speed predicted to elicit 75% of maximum oxygen uptake. One-minute expired air samples were collected at 0814–0815, 0829–0830, 0844–0845, and 0859–0900 during the run. Running speed was adjusted after each expired air collection if the oxygen consumption was above or below the predicted value. After the run, participants rested for 8 h (sitting reading, writing, working at a computer, or watching television) and consumed a test meal at 1100. This test meal was consumed within 15 min. Subjects left the laboratory at 1700. In the control trial participants rested for the full 9 h (sitting reading, writing, working at a computer or watching television) from 0800 to 1700, and they consumed an identical test meal to that consumed during the exercise trial at 1100. As in the exercise trial, this test meal was consumed within 15 min. A clock was on display in the laboratory throughout the trials, and therefore subjects were not devoid of time cues. Environmental temperature and humidity were monitored during the main trials using a handheld hygrometer (model RH85, Omega, Manchester, UK).
Before the start of each trial, subjects rested in a semi-supine position while a cannula (Venflon, Becton Dickinson, Helsinborg, Sweden) was inserted into an antecubital vein. Venous blood samples were subsequently collected into precooled 4.9-ml EDTA monovettes (Sarstedt, Leicester, UK) at 0800, 0830, 0900, 1000, 1100, 1130, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1500, 1600, and 1700. Patency of the cannula was maintained by flushing with a small amount of nonheparinized saline (0.9% wt/vol sodium chloride, Baxter Healthcare, Norfolk, UK) after each collection. The saline waste remaining in the connector tube after flushing was drawn off with a 2-ml syringe immediately before the next blood sample was collected. During the exercise trial at 0830, blood was collected while the participants straddled the treadmill; this took ∼1 min. All other blood samples were collected while subjects lay in a semisupine position. The EDTA monovettes were spun at 1,681 g for 10 min in a refrigerated centrifuge (Burkard, Hertfordhire, UK) at 4°C. The plasma supernatant was then aliquoted into Eppendorf tubes. These were stored at −20°C for analysis of glucose and insulin later.
Separate venous blood samples were drawn into 4.9-ml monovettes at 0800, 0830, 0900, 1100, 1200, and 1700 for the determination of plasma acylated ghrelin concentration. These monovettes contained EDTA and p-hydroxymercuribenzoic acid to prevent the degradation of acylated ghrelin by protease. The monovettes were spun at 1,287 g for 10 min in a refrigerated centrifuge at 4°C. The supernatants were then aliquoted into storage tubes, and 100 μl of 1 M HCl were added per milliliter of plasma. Samples were then spun at 1,287 g for 5 min in a refrigerated centrifuge at 4°C before being transferred into Eppendorf tubes. The samples were then stored at −20°C for analysis later.
At each blood sampling point, duplicate 20-μl blood samples were collected into micropipettes for the measurement of hemoglobin concentration, and triplicate 20-μl blood samples were collected into heparinized microhematocrit tubes for the determination of hematocrit. These were used to calculate changes in plasma volume (15).
Analysis of expired air samples.
Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production were determined from expired air samples using a paramagnetic oxygen analyzer and an infrared carbon dioxide analyzer respectively (series 1400, Servomex, Crowborough, East Sussex, UK). These analyzers were calibrated before analysis using gases of known concentration. Expired air volumes were measured using a dry gas meter (Harvard Apparatus, Edenbridge, Kent, UK) and corrected to standard temperature and pressure (dry). Oxygen consumption and carbon dioxide production values were used to calculate energy expenditure using indirect calorimetry (21).
Assessment of hunger
At the beginning of each main trial, participants rated how hungry they felt using a 16-point scale that ranged from 0 “not hungry” to 15 “very hungry.” Hunger ratings were recorded every 30 min thereafter for 5 h and at hourly intervals after this. A previously validated visual analog scale was also used to assess hunger (20). The two scales yielded identical findings, and only the findings from the 16-point scale will be reported.
The test meal fed to participants at 1100 on both trials consisted of a cheese, butter, and mayonnaise sandwich; crisps; a chocolate bar; and a full-fat milkshake. The macronutrient content of this meal was as follows: 1.47 g carbohydrate, 0.34 g protein, 0.81 g fat, and 60 kJ per kilogram body mass. This provided 38% of calories as carbohydrate, 10% as protein, and 52% as fat. Participants were encouraged to consume the meal within 15 min and kept to the same start and finish times on both trials. Water was available ad libitum during trials, and the volume and time of ingestion were recorded.
Plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations were determined by enzyme immunoassay (SPI BIO, Montigny le Bretonneux, France; supplied by Immuno Diagnostic Systems) using a plate reader (Opsys Microplate Reader, Dynex Technologies, Franklin, MA). Plasma glucose concentrations were determined by enzymatic, colorimetric methods (Randox Laboratories, County Antrim, UK) with the aid of an automated centrifugal analyzer (Cobas Mira Plus, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Plasma insulin concentrations were determined by a solid-phase 125I radioimmunoassay available in a commercial kit (MP Biomedicals, Orangeburg, NY) using an automated gamma counting system (Cobra II, Packard Instrument, Downers Grove, IL). To eliminate interassay variation, samples from each participant were analyzed in the same run. The within-batch coefficients of variation for the assays were as follows: acylated ghrelin 6.6%, insulin 7.4%, and glucose 1.8%.
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) software version 12.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Area under the curve (AUC) values for plasma acylated ghrelin, glucose, and insulin concentration vs. time curves were calculated using the trapezoidal rule. AUC values for hunger vs. time were also assessed using the same method. Student's t-tests for correlated data were used to assess differences between fasting values and between AUC values for acylated ghrelin, glucose, insulin, and hunger on the control and exercise trials. Repeated-measures, two-factor ANOVA was used to examine differences between the two trials over time for acylated ghrelin, glucose, insulin, hunger, body mass, and plasma volume change. Where appropriate, post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed using the Bonferroni method. The Pearson product moment correlation coefficient was used to examine relationships between variables. Statistical significance was accepted at the 5% level. Adjustment of values for changes in plasma volume did not alter the statistical findings, and hence for simplicity the unadjusted values are reported. Results are given as means ± SE unless otherwise stated.
Responses to treadmill running.
The mean percentage of maximum oxygen uptake elicited during exercise was 72 ± 2.0%, and the mean respiratory exchange ratio was 0.94 ± 0.01. Gross energy expenditure during exercise was 3.9 ± 0.2 MJ with 15 ± 4% of energy provided from fat and 85 ± 4% of energy provided from carbohydrate. Average heart rate during exercise was 179 ± 2 beats/min, and median rating of perceived exertion was 15, i.e., “hard” (range 13–16).
Body mass and fluid consumption.
Two-factor ANOVA revealed a main effect of trial (P < 0.009) and a significant interaction (P < 0.039) for body mass. In the control trial, body mass was 72.7 ± 2.3 kg at the start of the trial and 72.9 ± 2.4 kg at the end of the trial. In the exercise trial, body mass was 72.3 ± 2.3 kg at the start of the trial and 72.1 ± 2.3 kg at the end of the trial. Bonferroni post hoc tests revealed that body mass at the end of the exercise trial was significantly (P < 0.003) lower than body mass at the end of the control trial. There was a trend (Student's t-test, P = 0.061) for water consumption to be higher during the exercise trial (2,168 ± 335 ml) compared with the control trial (1,468 ± 114 ml).
Temperature and humidity.
There was no difference (Student's t-test, P = 0.502) in environmental temperature between the control and the exercise trials (26.2 ± 0.8 compared with 25.6 ± 1.0°C, respectively). Similarly, there was no difference (Student's t-test, P = 0.960) in humidity between the control and the exercise trials (39.4 ± 3.1 compared with 49.2 ± 4.1%, respectively).
Two-factor ANOVA revealed a main effect of time (P < 0.0005) and a trial × time interaction effect (P = 0.001) for hunger, indicating that responses differed over time between the exercise and control trials. Post hoc analysis indicated between trial differences at 0830, 0900, and 1500, but after adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method the only difference to remain significant (P = 0.003) was that at 1500 (Fig. 1). Between-trial differences in hunger ratings were also evaluated using AUC values for the 3 h before the meal (0800–1100), the 3 h after the meal (1100–1400), the 6 h after the meal (1100–1700), and the full 9 h (0800–1700). A significant difference was found over the first 3 h (0800–1100): 32 vs. 24 (mean values) for the control and exercise trials, respectively (Student's t-test, P = 0.013). The difference between AUC values for the 6 h after the meal (1100 to 1700 h) approached significance: 44 vs. 50 (mean values) for the control and exercise trials respectively (Student's t-test, P = 0.056).
Fasting plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations did not differ significantly between the control and exercise trials: control 150.3 ± 56.4, exercise 137.5 ± 46.8 pg/ml (P = 0.274). Two-factor ANOVA revealed a main effect of trial (P = 0.022), a main effect of time (P = 0.048), and a trial × time interaction (P = 0.043) for acylated ghrelin concentrations. Post hoc analysis indicated between-trial differences at 0830, 0900, and 1700, but after adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method the only difference to remain significant (P < 0.001) was that at 0830 (Fig. 2). AUC for the acylated ghrelin concentration vs. time curve was 38% lower over the first 3 h of the exercise trial and 35% lower over the full 9 h of the exercise trial compared with the control trial (Fig. 3).
Glucose and insulin.
Fasting plasma glucose concentrations did not differ significantly (Student's t-test, P = 0.613) between trials (control 5.4 ± 0.1 mmol/l, exercise 5.3 ± 0.1 mmol/l). Two-factor ANOVA revealed a main effect of trial (P = 0.013), a main effect of time (P < 0.0005), and a trial × time interaction (P = 0.021) for plasma glucose. Post hoc analysis indicated between-trial differences at 0830, 0900, and 1200, but after adjustment for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method none of these remained significant (Fig. 4). Total area under the concentration vs. time curve for plasma glucose was higher on the exercise trial compared with the control trial over the full 9 h: 50.6 ± 1.0 compared with 47.3 ± 0.8 mmol·l−1·9 h for the exercise and control trials respectively (Student's t-test, P = 0.016). The glucose AUC value was also higher for the 1-h exercise bout (0800–0900) compared with the same time period in the control trial: 6.48 ± 0.47 compared with 5.28 ± 0.09 mmol·l−1·1 h for exercise and control, respectively (Student's t-test, P = 0.036).
Fasting plasma insulin concentrations did not differ significantly (Student's t-test, P = 0.980) between trials (control 208.4 ± 20.1 pmol/l, exercise 207.7 ± 34.0 pmol/l). Two-factor ANOVA revealed a main effect of time (P < 0.0005) for plasma insulin, but there was no main effect of trial and no interaction effect (Fig. 4).
Correlations between acylated ghrelin and other variables.
Fasting plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations were not significantly correlated with BMI, body mass, waist circumference, maximum oxygen uptake, fasting plasma insulin concentrations, or fasting plasma glucose concentrations. A significant correlation (r = 0.699, P = 0.036) was observed between AUC values for plasma acylated ghrelin and hunger over the first 3 h of the exercise trial (0800–1100). Correlations between plasma acylated ghrelin and hunger over other periods (1100–1400, 1100–1700, and 0800–1700) were not significant for either the exercise trial or the control trial. When examining correlations between plasma acylated ghrelin and hunger ratings at individual time points (0800, 0830, 0900, 1100, 1200, and 1700) a significant correlation (r = 0.781, P = 0.013) was observed at 0900 on the exercise trial but not at any other time points on the exercise trial and not at any time points on the control trial. However, on removal of an outlier who had very high plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations, five significant (P < 0.05) correlations emerged between hunger ratings and plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations. These were in the control trial at 0800, 0830, 0900, and 1700 and in the exercise trial at 0900. Correlation coefficients ranged from r = 0.715 to r = 0.894. Plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations were not significantly correlated with plasma glucose or insulin concentrations at any time point during the trials.
To our knowledge, the present study is the first to examine plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations during exercise. The novel finding arising from this study is that there is a suppression of plasma acylated ghrelin during running. These findings suggest that acylated ghrelin responds differently to an exercise stimulus compared with total ghrelin, although a limitation of the study with regard to this finding is that total ghrelin concentrations were not measured. The present study also indicates that appetite is suppressed during exercise and to some extent in the immediate postexercise period.
Although the present study is the first to examine plasma acylated ghrelin during exercise, several previous studies have investigated the response of plasma total ghrelin to exercise (7, 11, 14, 24, 25, 32, 43, 49). The findings of most of these studies indicate plasma total ghrelin concentrations are unaffected by a single session of exercise, although one study has reported that serum total ghrelin concentrations are suppressed for up to an hour after the cessation of exercise (49), whereas another has reported that plasma total ghrelin concentrations are elevated during prolonged (3 h) moderate-intensity exercise (11). We did not measure plasma total ghrelin in the present study, but in a previous study using a similar exercise protocol our laboratory found no change in plasma total ghrelin concentration during or after exercise (7).
It is possible that previous studies failed to detect changes in ghrelin because they measured total ghrelin and not acylated ghrelin. Hosoda and colleagues (23) have reported that acylated ghrelin responds more quickly than total ghrelin in response to glucose ingestion and more dynamically; i.e., the percent changes in acylated ghrelin are greater than those for total ghrelin in response to glucose ingestion. It is possible that the same applies during exercise. It is known that splanchnic blood flow is reduced during intense exercise (42), and this would reduce oxygen delivery to the stomach and intestines. It is possible that this reduced oxygen delivery interferes in some way with the secretion of ghrelin, altering the ratio of total to acylated ghrelin, but we have no evidence to support this and the suggestion is highly speculative.
The finding that there is a suppression of hunger during and to some extent after exercise is consistent with results from previous studies that have monitored subjective hunger ratings following vigorous exercise (above 60% of maximum oxygen uptake) (4, 26, 27). As in previous studies, the suppression of hunger was short lived and hunger ratings returned to control values within 2 h of the cessation of exercise. The positive correlation between AUC values for plasma acylated ghrelin and hunger over the first 3 h of the exercise trial (0800–1100) indicates a tendency for higher acylated ghrelin concentrations in those with higher hunger ratings. This provides support for the hypothesis that acylated ghrelin and hunger are related during and immediately after exercise.
In addition to the decline in plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations during exercise, acylated ghrelin concentrations declined after feeding in both the control and exercise trials. This is consistent with data from studies examining the response to feeding of both plasma acylated ghrelin (1, 3, 17, 23, 34) and plasma total ghrelin (3, 12, 13, 23, 34). Macronutrient composition may influence the extent to which feeding suppresses ghrelin. There is evidence to suggest that carbohydrate has a greater suppressive effect on plasma acylated ghrelin than protein or fat (17), and at least two studies have reported that plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations are not suppressed significantly after high-fat meals (1, 47). Our findings conflict with these latter findings because the meal employed in the present study was high in fat. However, this meal was also high in energy content (4,200 kJ for an individual with a body mass of 70 kg), and this has been shown to impact on the suppression of total ghrelin (8). Moreover, high-fat meals have been shown to suppress serum total ghrelin concentrations (40). Considering the similarity in the response of acylated and total ghrelin to feeding, it is difficult to understand why there is a divergent response to exercise (i.e., no change in total ghrelin but a reduction in acylated ghrelin). The findings suggest that the mechanism by which exercise alters acylated ghrelin may differ from that by which feeding alters acylated ghrelin. This is feasible because factors other than feeding, such as circadian rhythms and body composition, have been demonstrated to influence total plasma ghrelin concentration (18, 38).
The mechanisms by which feeding suppresses ghrelin concentration are thought to involve post-gastric feedback. Intravenous infusion of insulin suppresses plasma total ghrelin concentrations in humans (19) as does intravenous infusion of glucose (44). In individuals with Type 1 diabetes, meal intake suppresses total plasma ghrelin concentrations when insulin is administered but not in the absence of insulin (35). Moreover, at least one study has shown an inverse correlation between the percent decrease in plasma total ghrelin concentration and the percent increase in plasma insulin and glucose concentration after meals (3). In the present study, the AUC values for plasma glucose concentration were elevated during the 1-h run compared with the same time period during the control trial. This is consistent with the findings of previous studies that also demonstrate an increase in plasma glucose during exercise, particularly in trained subjects (28, 31). This may in part explain the lower AUC values for plasma acylated ghrelin during the exercise trial. Plasma insulin concentrations were not elevated during exercise in the present study, in line with previous findings (28, 31), and are therefore unlikely to contribute to the suppression of plasma acylated ghrelin during exercise.
In the present study, there was a tendency for higher hunger ratings over the last 5 h of the exercise trial compared with the control trial. This is probably because subjects were in energy deficit during the exercise trial compared with the control trial. Previous research has demonstrated an increase in energy intake after an acute bout of exercise (39) and after a 1-wk period of exercise training (45). This is not a universal finding because one study has reported no increase in energy intake over a 2-day period following acute bouts of exercise (27). Although there was a transient reduction in appetite after exercise in the present study, it is likely that appetite was elevated later in the day due to the 3.9-MJ (930 kcal) energy expenditure resulting from the run. However, the 9-h values for plasma acylated ghrelin concentration do not support the notion that hunger was elevated at the end of the exercise trial. In fact, plasma acylated ghrelin concentrations at 9 h suggest that hunger was still suppressed on the exercise trial compared with the control trial. This apparent contradiction requires further study.
The present study had several limitations. First, the subjects were young and well trained, and therefore the findings may not apply to older subjects or to untrained subjects. Second, the low sample size may have limited the power to detect significant relationships between plasma acylated ghrelin and other variables. Third, plasma acylated ghrelin was measured at only six time points over the 9-h observation period. More frequent measurements of plasma acylated ghrelin would provide a clearer picture of the responses to exercise and feeding. Finally, plasma total ghrelin concentration was not measured, limiting our ability to determine the extent of variation between the responses of plasma acylated ghrelin and plasma total ghrelin to exercise and feeding.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that plasma acylated ghrelin concentration is reduced during an acute bout of treadmill running, and this lends support for the role of acylated ghrelin in appetite suppression during and immediately after exercise. Further research is required to determine the influence of other modes, durations, and intensities of exercise on plasma acylated ghrelin concentration and to document plasma acylated ghrelin responses to exercise in different subject groups (e.g., older subjects, untrained subjects, obese subjects). Such research could have important implications regarding the role of exercise in weight management.
This project received financial support from Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals.
We thank Joe Edwards and Tracey McAuley for help with the data collection and all of the volunteers for their participation in this study.
D. R. Broom recruited the subjects, supervised the data collection, assisted with all aspects of the biochemistry, and performed the data analysis. N. C. Bishop provided guidance and assistance to D. J. Stensel during pilot work with the acylated ghrelin assay. S. F. Burns and M. Miyashita assisted with data collection, blood biochemistry, and data analysis. D. J. Stensel conceived the study, obtained the funding, performed the venous cannulations, and analyzed the acylated ghrelin samples. D. J. Stensel and D. R. Broom wrote the manuscript.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- Copyright © 2007 the American Physiological Society