HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 99/6/2278    most recent 00713.2005v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chemla, D. Articles by Nitenberg, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chemla, D. Articles by Nitenberg, A.

Mean aortic pressure is the geometric mean of systolic and diastolic aortic pressure in resting humans

Service de Physiologie Cardio-Respiratoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud 11, Unité Propre de Recherche de l'Enseignement Supérieur 2705, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre; and the Service de Physiologie et d'Explorations Fonctionnelles, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Jean Verdier, Université Paris 13, Bondy, France

Submitted 16 June 2005 ; accepted in final form 25 July 2005

The aim of our study was twofold: 1) to establish a mathematical link between mean aortic pressure (MAP) and systolic (SAP) and diastolic aortic pressures (DAP) by testing the hypothesis that either the geometric mean or the harmonic mean of SAP and DAP were reliable MAP estimates; and 2) to critically evaluate three empirical formulas recently proposed to estimate MAP. High-fidelity pressures were recorded at rest at the aortic root level in controls (n = 31) and in subjects with various forms of cardiovascular diseases (n = 108). The time-averaged MAP and the pulse pressure (PP = SAP – DAP) were calculated. The MAP ranged from 66 to 160 mmHg [mean = 107.9 mmHg (SD 18.2)]. The geometric mean, i.e., the square root of the product of SAP and DAP, furnished a reliable estimate of MAP [mean bias = 0.3 mmHg (SD 2.7)]. The harmonic mean was inaccurate. The following MAP formulas were also tested: DAP + 0.412 PP (Meaney E, Alva F, Meaney A, Alva J, and Webel R. Heart 84: 64, 2000), DAP + 0.33 PP + 5 mmHg [Chemla D, Hébert JL, Aptecar E, Mazoit JX, Zamani K, Frank R, Fontaine G, Nitenberg A, and Lecarpentier Y. Clin Sci (Lond) 103: 7–13, 2002], and DAP + [0.33 + (heart rate x 0.0012)] PP (Razminia M, Trivedi A, Molnar J, Elbzour M, Guerrero M, Salem Y, Ahmed A, Khosla S, Lubell DL. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 63: 419–425, 2004). They all provided accurate and precise estimates of MAP [mean bias = –0.2 (SD 2.9), –0.3 (SD 2.7), and 0.1 mmHg (SD 2.9), respectively]. The implications of the geometric mean pressure strictly pertained to the central (not peripheral) level. It was demonstrated that the fractional systolic (SAP/MAP) and diastolic (DAP/MAP) pressures were reciprocal estimates of aortic pulsatility and that the SAP times DAP product matched the total peripheral resistance times cardiac power product. In conclusion, although the previously described thumb-rules applied, the "geometric MAP" appears more valuable as it established a simple mathematical link between the steady and pulsatile component of aortic pressure.

pulse pressure; cardiac power; total peripheral resistance

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Chemla, V. Castelain, S. Provencher, M. Humbert, G. Simonneau, and P. Herve Evaluation of Various Empirical Formulas for Estimating Mean Pulmonary Artery Pressure by Using Systolic Pulmonary Artery Pressure in Adults Chest, March 1, 2009; 135(3): 760 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]