HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 97/5/1840    most recent 01319.2003v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mansour, K. F. Articles by Badr, M. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mansour, K. F. Articles by Badr, M. S.

Noninvasive determination of upper airway resistance and flow limitation

Sleep Research Laboratory, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

Submitted 10 December 2003 ; accepted in final form 25 May 2004

We have shown that a polynomial equation, F(P) = AP³ + BP² + CP + D, where F is flow and P is pressure, can accurately determine the presence of inspiratory flow limitation (IFL). This equation requires the invasive measurement of supraglottic pressure. We hypothesized that a modification of the equation that substitutes time for pressure would be accurate for the detection of IFL and allow for the noninvasive measurement of upper airway resistance. The modified equation is F(t) = At³ + Bt² + Ct + D, where F is flow and t is time from the onset of inspiration. To test our hypotheses, data analysis was performed as follows on 440 randomly chosen breaths from 18 subjects. First, we performed linear regression and determined that there is a linear relationship between pressure and time in the upper airway (R² 0.96 ± 0.05, slope 0.96 ± 0.06), indicating that time can be a surrogate for pressure. Second, we performed curve fitting and found that polynomial equation accurately predicts the relationship between flow and time in the upper airway (R² 0.93 ± 0.12, error fit 0.02 ± 0.08). Third, we performed a sensitivity-specificity analysis comparing the mathematical determination of IFL to manual determination using a pressure-flow loop. Mathematical determination had both high sensitivity (96%) and specificity (99%). Fourth, we calculated the upper airway resistance using the polynomial equation and compared the measurement to the manually determined upper airway resistance (also from a pressure-flow loop) using Bland-Altman analysis. Mean difference between calculated and measured upper airway resistance was 0.0 cmH₂O·l^–1·s^–1 (95% confidence interval –0.2, 0.2) with upper and lower limits of agreement of 2.8 cmH₂O·l^–1·s^–1 and –2.8 cmH₂O·l^–1·s^–1. We conclude that a polynomial equation can be used to model the flow-time relationship, allowing for the objective and accurate determination of upper airway resistance and the presence of IFL.

polynomial equation; pressure-flow relationship

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. P. Patil, H. Schneider, J. J. Marx, E. Gladmon, A. R. Schwartz, and P. L. Smith Neuromechanical control of upper airway patency during sleep J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2007; 102(2): 547 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. F. Mansour, J. A. Rowley, and M. S. Badr Measurement of pharyngeal cross-sectional area by finite element analysis J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2006; 100(1): 294 - 303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]