Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 96: 1651-1657, 2004. First published December 19, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00507.2003
8750-7587/04 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
96/5/1651    most recent
00507.2003v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kjærgaard, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mølhave, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kjærgaard, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Mølhave, L.

Ozone exposure decreases the effect of a deep inhalation on forced expiratory flow in normal subjects

S. K. Kjærgaard,1 O. F. Pedersen,1 M. R. Miller,2 T. R. Rasmussen,1 J. C. Hansen,1 and L. Mølhave1

1Department of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark; and 2Department of Medicine, University of Birmingham, Selly Oak Hospital, Birmingham B29 6JD, United Kingdom

Submitted 13 May 2003 ; accepted in final form 17 December 2003

Sixteen healthy nonsmoking subjects (7 women), 21-49 yr old, were exposed in a climate chamber to either clean air or 300 parts/billion ozone on 4 days for 5 h each day. Before each exposure, the subjects had been pretreated with either oxidants (fish oil) or antioxidants (multivitamins). The study design was double-blind crossover with randomized allocation to the exposure regime. Full and partial flow-volume curves were recorded in the morning and before and during a histamine provocation at the end of the day. Nasal cavity volume and inflammatory markers in nasal lavage fluid were also measured. Compared with air, ozone exposure decreased peak expiratory flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and forced vital capacity (FVC), with no significant effect from the pretreatment regimens. Ozone decreased the ratio of maximal to partial flow at 40% FVC by 0.08 ± 0.03 (mean ± SE, analysis of variance: P = 0.018) and at 30% FVC by 0.10 ± 0.05 (P = 0.070). Ozone exposure did not significantly increase bronchial responsiveness, but, after treatment with fish oil, partial flows decreased more than after vitamins during the histamine test, without changing the maximal-to-partial flow ratio. The decreased effect of a deep inhalation after ozone exposure can be explained by changes in airway hysteresis relative to parenchymal hysteresis, due either to ozone-induced airway inflammation or to less deep inspiration after ozone, not significantly influenced by multivitamins or fish oil.

spirometry; airway inflammation; maximal-to-partial flow ratio; bronchial hyperresponsiveness



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: O. F. Pedersen, Dept. of Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Univ. of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark (E-mail: OFP{at}mil.au.dk).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M A Arbex, G M de Souza Conceicao, S P Cendon, F F Arbex, A C Lopes, E P Moyses, S L Santiago, P H N Saldiva, L A A Pereira, and A L F Braga
Urban air pollution and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-related emergency department visits
J Epidemiol Community Health, October 1, 2009; 63(10): 777 - 783.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2004 by the American Physiological Society.