HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 96/4/1555    most recent 01085.2003v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rabin, E. Articles by Gordon, A. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rabin, E. Articles by Gordon, A. M.

HIGHLIGHTED TOPICS
Neural Control of Movement

Influence of fingertip contact on illusory arm movements

¹Department of Biobehavioral Sciences, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York 10027; and ²Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032

Submitted 7 October 2003 ; accepted in final form 17 November 2003

Recent evidence suggests that reaching movements are more accurate when end point contact occurs, suggesting that fingertip contact contributes to a final estimation of arm position. In the present study we tested two hypotheses: 1) that fingertip contact influences illusions of arm movement produced by muscle vibration and 2) that this influence depends on the a priori context of the stability of the contact surface. Subjects sat with their elbows on a table and eyes closed. They demonstrated the perceived orientation of the left (cue) arm by mirroring the location with the right (report) arm. We manipulated deep proprioceptive cues by vibrating the left biceps brachia, causing illusions of elbow extension, and tested whether these illusions were altered when the fingertip remained in contact with a stable external surface. The context at this point represents a prior assumption that the external contact surface is stable. Midway through the experiment, the context was changed by challenging the prior assumption that the contact surface was stable by demonstrating that it could move. Unbeknownst to the subject, the external contact surface remained stable during data collection throughout the experiment. As expected, without tactile cues, biceps vibration caused illusory elbow extension. Conditions with fingertip contact and biceps vibration in the stable context demonstrated that contact largely eliminated the overestimation of cue arm elbow angle. However, in the context of a possibly unstable (movable) contact surface, the reports of elbow extension returned. Thus a priori notions about the stability context of an external contact surface influence how this tactile cue is integrated with proprioceptive sensory modalities to generate an estimate of arm location in space. These findings support the notion that tactile cues are used to calibrate proprioception against external spatial frameworks.

proprioception; touch; muscle vibration; sensory integration; haptics

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Rabin, P. DiZio, J. Ventura, and J. R. Lackner Influences of Arm Proprioception and Degrees of Freedom on Postural Control With Light Touch Feedback J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 595 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. E. Hudson, L. T. Maloney, and M. S. Landy Movement Planning With Probabilistic Target Information J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 3034 - 3046. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Johannsen, A. M. Wing, and V. Hatzitaki Effects of Maintaining Touch Contact on Predictive and Reactive Balance J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2007; 97(4): 2686 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]