HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 95/4/1648    most recent 01189.2002v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Oskouei, M. A. E. Articles by Herzog, W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Oskouei, M. A. E. Articles by Herzog, W

Variability in the interpolated twitch torque for maximal and submaximal voluntary contractions

Human Performance Laboratory, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4

Submitted 23 December 2002 ; accepted in final form 27 May 2003

The superimposed twitch technique is frequently used to study the degree of motor unit activation during voluntary effort. This technique is one of the preferred methods to determine the activation deficit (AD) in normal, athletic, and patient populations. One of the limitations of the superimposed twitch technique is its variability under given contractile conditions. The objective of this research was to determine the source(s) of variability in the superimposed twitch force (STF) for repeat measurements. We hypothesized that the variability in the AD measurements may be caused by the timing of the twitch force relative to the onset of muscle activation, by force transients during the twitch application, by small variations in the actual force from the nominal target force, and by variations in the resting twitch force. Twenty-eight healthy subjects participated in this study. Sixteen of these subjects participated in a protocol involving contractions at 50% of their maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) effort, whereas the remaining 12 participated in a protocol involving contractions at 100% of their MVC. Doublet-twitch stimuli were superimposed onto the 50 and 100% effort knee extensor muscle contractions, and the resting twitch forces, voluntary knee extensor forces, and STFs were then measured. The mean resting twitch forces obtained before and after 8 s of 50% of MVC were the same. Similarly, the mean STFs determined at 1, 3, 5, and 7 s into the 50% MVC were the same. The variations in twitch force were significantly smaller after accounting for the actual force at twitch application than those calculated from the prescribed forces during the 50% MVC protocol (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the AD and the actual force showed statistically significant negative correlations for the 50% MVC tests. The interpolated twitch torque determined for the maximal effort contractions ranged from 1 to 70%. In contrast to the protocol at 50% of MVC, negative correlations were only observed in 5 of the 12 subjects during the 100% effort contractions. These results suggest that small variations in the actual force from the target force can account for the majority of the variations in the STFs for submaximal but not maximal effort contractions. For the maximal effort contractions, large variations in the STF exist due to undetermined causes.

superimposed twitch technique; activation deficit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. de Haan, K. H. L. Gerrits, and C. J. de Ruiter Counterpoint: The interpolated twitch does not provide a valid measure of the voluntary activation of muscle J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 355 - 357. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Rebuttal from de Haan, Gerrits, and de Ruiter J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 358 - 358. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Thomas, S. S. Cheung, G. C. Elder, and G. G. Sleivert Voluntary muscle activation is impaired by core temperature rather than local muscle temperature J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2006; 100(4): 1361 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]