Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Advances in Physiology Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 95: 1632-1637, 2003. First published June 6, 2003; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00983.2002
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
95/4/1632    most recent
00983.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Billaut, F.
Right arrow Articles by Falgairette, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Billaut, F.
Right arrow Articles by Falgairette, G.

Maximal intermittent cycling exercise: effects of recovery duration and gender

François Billaut, Magali Giacomoni, and Guy Falgairette

Laboratoire d'Ergonomie Sportive et Performance-EA 3162, Université de Toulon-Var, 83957 La Garde, France

Submitted 26 October 2002 ; accepted in final form 4 June 2003

This study aimed to evaluate potential gender differences in recovery of power output during repeated all-out cycling exercise. Twenty men and thirteen women performed four series of two sprints (Sp1 and Sp2) of 8 s, separated by 15-, 30-, 60-, and 120-s recovery. Peak power (Ppeak), power at the 8th s, total mechanical work, and time to Ppeak were calculated for each sprint. Ppeak and mechanical work decreased significantly between Sp1 and Sp2 after 15-s recovery in both men (-6.4 and -9.4%, respectively) and women (-7.4 and -6.8%, respectively). Time to Ppeak did not change between recovery durations, but women reached their peak power more slowly than men (on average 5.15 ± 1.2 and 3.8 ± 1.2 s, respectively; P < 0.01). During Sp1 and Sp2, linear regressions from Ppeak to power at the 8th s showed a greater power decrease (%Ppeak) in women compared with men (P < 0.05). In conclusion, patterns of power output recovery between two consecutive short bouts were similar in men and women, despite lower overall performance and greater fatigability during sprints in women.

anaerobic power; all-out repeated exercise; cycle ergometer



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: G. Falgairette, Laboratoire d'Ergonomie Sportive et Performance-EA 3162, Université de Toulon-Var, Ave. de l'Université, BP 132, 83957 La Garde Cedex, France (E-mail: falgairette{at}univ-tln.fr).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
A. Mendez-Villanueva, J. Fernandez-Fernandez, and D. Bishop
Exercise-induced homeostatic perturbations provoked by singles tennis match play with reference to development of fatigue
Br. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 41(11): 717 - 722.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.