Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

J Appl Physiol 94: 883-890, 2003. First published November 1, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00658.2002
8750-7587/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
94/3/883    most recent
00658.2002v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, A. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fitzpatrick, M. F.
Right arrow Articles by Girard, A. M.
Vol. 94, Issue 3, 883-890, March 2003

Partitioning of inhaled ventilation between the nasal and oral routes during sleep in normal subjects

Michael F. Fitzpatrick, Helen S. Driver, Neela Chatha, Nha Voduc, and Alison M. Girard

Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6

The oral and nasal contributions to inhaled ventilation were simultaneously quantified during sleep in 10 healthy subjects (5 men, 5 women) aged 43 ± 5 yr, with normal nasal resistance (mean 2.0 ± 0.3 cmH2O · l-1 · s-1) by use of a divided oral and nasal mask. Minute ventilation awake (5.9 ± 0.3 l/min) was higher than that during sleep (5.2 ± 0.3 l/min; P < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference in minute ventilation between different sleep stages (P = 0.44): stage 2 5.3 ± 0.3, slow-wave 5.2 ± 0.2, and rapid-eye-movement sleep 5.2 ± 0.2 l/min. The oral fraction of inhaled ventilation during wakefulness (7.6 ± 4%) was not significantly different from that during sleep (4.3 ± 2%; mean difference 3.3%, 95% confidence interval -2.1-8.8%, P = 0.19), and no significant difference (P = 0.14) in oral fraction was observed between different sleep stages: stage two 5.1 ± 2.8, slow-wave 4.2 ± 1.8, rapid-eye-movement 3.1 ± 1.7%. Thus the inhaled oral fraction in normal subjects is small and does not change significantly with sleep stage.

upper airway; control of breathing; sleep apnea; oronasal


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Chem SensesHome page
A. Arzi, L. Sela, A. Green, G. Givaty, Y. Dagan, and N. Sobel
The Influence of Odorants on Respiratory Patterns in Sleep
Chem Senses, November 16, 2009; (2009) bjp079v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
W. T. McNicholas
The nose and OSA: variable nasal obstruction may be more important in pathophysiology than fixed obstruction
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 3 - 8.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
I. Koutsourelakis and S. Zakynthinos
From the authors
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2008; 32(1): 246 - 247.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
I. Koutsourelakis, G. Georgoulopoulos, E. Perraki, E. Vagiakis, C. Roussos, and S. G. Zakynthinos
Randomised trial of nasal surgery for fixed nasal obstruction in obstructive sleep apnoea
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 110 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. Willing, M. S. Pedro, H. S. Driver, P. Munt, and M. F. Fitzpatrick
The acute impact of continuous positive airway pressure on nasal resistance: a randomized controlled comparison
J Appl Physiol, March 1, 2007; 102(3): 1214 - 1219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
I. Koutsourelakis, E. Vagiakis, C. Roussos, and S. Zakynthinos
Obstructive sleep apnoea and oral breathing in patients free of nasal obstruction
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2006; 28(6): 1222 - 1228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
H. A. McLean, A. M. Urton, H. S. Driver, A. K. W. Tan, A. G. Day, P. W. Munt, and M. F. Fitzpatrick
Effect of treating severe nasal obstruction on the severity of obstructive sleep apnoea
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2005; 25(3): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
M.R. Madronio, E. Di Somma, R. Stavrinou, J.P. Kirkness, E. Goldfinch, J.R. Wheatley, and T.C. Amis
Older individuals have increased oro-nasal breathing during sleep
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2004; 24(1): 71 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Eur Respir JHome page
M.F. Fitzpatrick, H. McLean, A.M. Urton, A. Tan, D. O'Donnell, and H.S. Driver
Effect of nasal or oral breathing route on upper airway resistance during sleep
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2003; 22(5): 827 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online