Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 93: 1084-1092, 2002. First published May 31, 2002; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01140.2001
8750-7587/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
93/3/1084    most recent
01140.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badr, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mansour, K. F.
Right arrow Articles by Badr, M. S.
Vol. 93, Issue 3, 1084-1092, September 2002

A mathematical model to detect inspiratory flow limitation during sleep

Khaled F. Mansour, James A. Rowley, A. A. Meshenish, Mahdi A. Shkoukani, and M. Safwan Badr

Sleep Research Laboratory, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201

The physiological significance of inspiratory flow limitation (IFL) has recently been recognized, but methods of detecting IFL can be subjective. We sought to develop a mathematical model of the upper airway pressure-flow relationship that would objectively detect flow limitation. We present a theoretical discussion that predicts that a polynomial function [F(P) = AP3 + BP2 + CP + D, where F(P) is flow and P is supraglottic pressure] best characterizes the pressure-flow relationship and allows for the objective detection of IFL. In protocol 1, step 1, we performed curve-fitting of the pressure-flow relationship of 20 breaths to 5 mathematical functions and found that highest correlation coefficients (R2) for quadratic (0.88 ± 0.10) and polynomial (0.91 ± 0.05; P < 0.05 for both compared with the other functions) functions. In step 2, we performed error-fit calculations on 50 breaths by comparing the quadratic and polynomial functions and found that the error fit was lowest for the polynomial function (3.3 ± 0.06 vs. 21.1 ± 19.0%; P < 0.001). In protocol 2, we performed sensitivity/specificity analysis on two sets of breaths (50 and 544 breaths) by comparing the mathematical determination of IFL to manual determination. Mathematical determination of IFL had high sensitivity and specificity and a positive predictive value (>99% for each). We conclude that a polynomial function can be used to predict the relationship between pressure and flow in the upper airway and objectively determine the presence of IFL.

upper airway; polynomial equation; pressure-flow relationship


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
B. M. McGinley, S. P. Patil, J. P. Kirkness, P. L. Smith, A. R. Schwartz, and H. Schneider
A Nasal Cannula Can Be Used to Treat Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., July 15, 2007; 176(2): 194 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
K. F. Mansour, J. A. Rowley, and M. S. Badr
Noninvasive determination of upper airway resistance and flow limitation
J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2004; 97(5): 1840 - 1848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online