Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 92: 1159-1168, 2002. First published November 9, 2001; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00358.2001
8750-7587/02 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
92/3/1159    most recent
00358.2001v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moosavi, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moosavi, S. H.
Right arrow Articles by Adams, L.
Vol. 92, Issue 3, 1159-1168, March 2002

Repeated exercise paired with "imperceptible" dead space loading does not alter VE of subsequent exercise in humans

S. H. Moosavi, A. Guz, and L. Adams

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Campus, London W6 8RP, United Kingdom

We employed an associative learning paradigm to test the hypothesis that exercise hyperpnea in humans arises from learned responses forged by prior experience. Twelve subjects undertook a "conditioning" and a "nonconditioning" session on separate days, with order of performance counterbalanced among subjects. In both sessions, subjects performed repeated bouts of 6 min of treadmill exercise, each separated by 5 min of rest. The only difference between sessions was that all the second-to-penultimate runs of the conditioning session were performed with added dead space in the breathing circuit. Cardiorespiratory responses during the first and last runs (the "control" and "test" runs) were compared for each session. Steady-state exercise end-tidal PCO2 was significantly lower (P = 0.003) during test than during control runs for both sessions (dropping by 1.8 ± 2 and 1.4 ± 3 Torr during conditioning and nonconditioning sessions, respectively). This and all other test-control run differences tended to be greater during the first session performed regardless of session type. Our data provide no support for the hypothesis implicating associative learning processes in the ventilatory response to exercise in humans.

exercise hyperpnea; classical conditioning; long-term modulation; minute ventilation


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. S. Mitchell and S. M. Johnson
Plasticity in Respiratory Motor Control: Invited Review: Neuroplasticity in respiratory motor control
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2003; 94(1): 358 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online