Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (May 14, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91541.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
107/1/112    most recent
91541.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cresswell, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffman, B. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cresswell, A. G.
Submitted on November 25, 2008
Revised on April 21, 2009
Accepted on May 8, 2009

Increases in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal plantar flexion

B. W. Hoffman1*, Tomomichi Oya1, Timothy John Carroll1, and Andrew G. Cresswell1

1 The University of Queensland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: bhoffman{at}hms.uq.edu.au.

Studying the responsiveness of specific CNS pathways to electrical or magnetic stimulation can provide important information regarding fatigue processes in the central nervous system. In this study, we investigated the changes in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal contraction of the triceps surae. Comparisons were made between the size of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by motor cortical stimulation and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited via magnetic stimulation of the descending tracts, in order to determine the site of any change in corticospinal responsiveness. Participants maintained an isometric contraction of triceps surae at 30% of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) for as long as possible on two occasions. Stimulation was applied either to the motor cortex or to the cervicomedullary junction every minute during contraction until task failure. Peripheral nerve stimulation was also applied to evoke maximal M-waves (Mmax) and a superimposed twitch. Additionally, MEPs and CMEPs were evoked during brief contractions at 80, 90 and 100% MVC as a non-fatigue control. During the sustained contractions, MEP size increased significantly in both soleus (113%; SOL) and medial gastrocnemius (108%; MG) and at task failure matched MEP size in the pre-fatigue MVC (~20-25% Mmax). In contrast, CMEP size increased significantly in MG (51%) but not in SOL (63%), and at task failure was significantly smaller than during pre-fatigue MVC (5-6% Mmax versus 11-13% Mmax). The data indicate that cortical processes contribute substantially to the increase in corticospinal responsiveness observed during sustained submaximal contraction of triceps surae.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.