Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 19, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91501.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/5/1668    most recent
91501.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, R.
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, R.
Right arrow Articles by Oliven, A.
Submitted on November 18, 2008
Revised on February 11, 2009
Accepted on February 11, 2009

Interacting effects of genioglossus stimulation and mandibular advancement in sleep apnea

Ron Oliven1, Naveh Tov1, Majed Odeh2, Luis Gaitini3, Uri Steinfeld4, Alan R. Schwartz5, and Arie Oliven6*

1 Bnai Zion Medical Center
2 Bnai Zion Medical Center and Technion
3 Bnai Zion MedicalCenter and Technion
4 Technion
5 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
6 Technion and Bnai Zion Medical Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: oliven{at}tx.technion.ac.il.

Both mandibular advancement (MA) and contraction of the genioglossus (GG) have been shown to improve upper airway patency, but neither one achieves the effect of CPAP treatment. In the present study we assessed the combined effect of MA and GG stimulation on the relaxed pharynx in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We evaluated responses of upper airway pressure-flow relationships and endoscopically determined pharyngeal cross-sectional area to MA and electrical stimulation of the GG in 14 propofol-anesthetized OSA patients. Measurements were undertaken at multiple levels of CPAP, enabling calculation of the critical closing pressure (Pcrit), upstream resistance (Rus) and pharyngeal compliance. GG contraction, MA and the combination of both shifted the pressure:flow relationships toward higher flow levels, resulting in progressively lower Pcrit (from baseline of 2.9±2.2 to 0.9±2.5, -1.4±2.9 and -4.2±3.3 cmH2O, respectively), without significant change in Rus. {Delta}Pcrit during GG stimulation was significantly larger during MA than under baseline conditions (-2.8±1.4 vs. -2.0±1.4 cmH2O, p=0.011). Combining the effect of GG stimulation with MA lowered Pcrit below 0 in all patients, and restored pharyngeal patency to a level that enabled flow above the hypopnea level in 10/14 of the patients. Velopharyngeal compliance was not affected by either manipulation. We conclude that the combined effect of MA and GG stimulation is additive and may act in synergy, preventing substantial flow limitation of the relaxed pharynx in most OSA patients.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.