Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 31, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91365.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/3/950    most recent
91365.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gandevia, S. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Gandevia, S. C.
Submitted on October 14, 2008
Revised on December 19, 2008
Accepted on December 30, 2008

Signals of motor command bias joint position sense in the presence of feedback from proprioceptors

Janette L. Smith1, Matthew Crawford2, Uwe Proske3, Janet L. Taylor4, and Simon C. Gandevia4*

1 University of Newcastle
2 Prince of Wales Hospital
3 Monash University
4 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: s.gandevia.jap{at}unsw.edu.au.

Joint position sense is believed to be mediated by muscle afferent signals. Because a 'phantom' hand produced by a sensory and motor nerve block appears to move in the direction of voluntary effort, signals of 'motor command' or 'effort' can influence perceived joint position. To determine whether this occurs when sensory signals are available, 3 studies assessed position sense when motor command and afferent signals were available, but joint movement was prevented. First, the hand was positioned to stop movement at the proximal joint of the middle finger and movement at the distal joint was impossible because the muscles had been 'disengaged'. Voluntary efforts produced illusory position changes in the direction of the effort (12.6° ± 2.0° distal joint; 12.3° ± 2.3° proximal joint for efforts at 30% maximum; mean ± SD). Second, when subjects attempted to move the index finger under isometric conditions, the index finger appeared to move 7.4° ± 1.2° in the direction of efforts. These illusions graded with the level of effort (10% or 30% maximum) and far exceeded any real joint movement. Finally, because changes in muscle afferent feedback might have accompanied the voluntary efforts, all forearm and hand muscles were completely paralysed by locally infused rocuronium. During paralysis, passive wrist position was signalled accurately, but, during attempted efforts (30% maximum), perceived wrist position changed by 9.7° ± 4.9°s. Before paralysis, isometric efforts changed it by 6.7±3.6°. Thus, all studies concur: when joint movement is prevented, signals of motor command contribute to joint position sense.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
U. Proske and S. C. Gandevia
The kinaesthetic senses
J. Physiol., September 1, 2009; 587(17): 4139 - 4146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. Thyrion and J.-P. Roll
Perceptual Integration of Illusory and Imagined Kinesthetic Images
J. Neurosci., July 1, 2009; 29(26): 8483 - 8492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.