Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 26, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91364.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/5/1593    most recent
91364.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Todd, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ridding, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Todd, G.
Right arrow Articles by Ridding, M. C.
Submitted on October 13, 2008
Revised on February 11, 2009
Accepted on February 20, 2009

Voluntary movement and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over human motor cortex

Gabrielle Todd1*, Nigel C. Rogasch1, Stanley Charles Flavel2, and Michael C. Ridding3

1 University of Adelaide
2 University of South Australia
3 The University of Adelaide

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gabrielle.todd{at}adelaide.edu.au.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can induce short-term reorganisation of human motor cortex. Here, we investigated the effect of rTMS during relaxation and weak voluntary muscle contraction on motor cortex excitability and hand function. Subjects (n=60) participated in one of four studies. Single transcranial magnetic stimuli were delivered over the motor area of the first dorsal interosseus for measurement of motor evoked potential (MEP) size before and after real or sham rTMS delivered at an intensity of 80% of active motor threshold. rTMS involved trains of stimuli applied at 6 Hz for 5 s and repeated every 30 s for 10 minutes. Resting MEP size was suppressed for 15 mins after rTMS during relaxation. However, MEP suppression was abolished when additional brief voluntary contractions were performed before and after rTMS (Study one). Resting MEP size was suppressed for 30 mins after rTMS during weak voluntary contraction. MEP suppression was present even though voluntary contractions were performed before and after rTMS (Study two). The MEP suppression most likely reflects a decrease in motor cortical excitability. Surprisingly, rTMS during voluntary contraction did not alter maximal finger tapping speed or performance on a Grooved Pegboard test, object grip and lift task (Study three), and visuomotor tracking task (Study four). These studies document the complex relationship between voluntary movement and rTMS-induced plasticity in motor cortex. This work has implications for the optimisation of rTMS parameters for improved efficacy and potential therapeutic applications.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.