Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 26, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91351.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/5/1692    most recent
91351.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burd, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burd, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, S. M.
Submitted on October 8, 2008
Revised on November 16, 2008
Accepted on November 24, 2008

Exercise Training and Protein Metabolism: Influences of Contraction, Protein Intake, and Sex-based differences

Nicholas A. Burd1, Jason E. Tang, Daniel R. Moore1, and Stuart M. Phillips1*

1 McMaster University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: phillis{at}mcmaster.ca.

Muscle contraction during exercise, whether resistive or endurance in nature, has profound affects on muscle protein turnover. For example, a single bout of exercise can stimulate muscle protein synthesis (MPS) in the immediate acute (1-4 h) and subsequent (8 - 72 h) time period. It is well established that feeding during the post-exercise period is required to bring about a positive net protein balance (MPS - muscle protein breakdown; MPB). There is mounting evidence that the timing of ingestion and the protein source during post during recovery independently regulate the protein synthetic response and influence the extent of muscle hypertrophy. Some minor sex-based differences in muscle turnover exist in young men and women; however, with aging there appear to be quite stark sex-based differences in response to both feeding and resistance exercise. The recognition of anabolic signaling pathways and molecules are also enhancing our understanding of the regulation of protein turnover following exercise perturbations. In this review we summarize the current understanding of muscle protein turnover in response to exercise and feeding and highlight potential sex-based dimorphisms. Further we examine the underlying anabolic signaling pathways and molecules that regulate these processes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. B. Rasmussen and E. A. Richter
The balancing act between the cellular processes of protein synthesis and breakdown: exercise as a model to understand the molecular mechanisms regulating muscle mass
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2009; 106(4): 1365 - 1366.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.