|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Laboratory of Exercise Physiology, University of Saint-Etienne and Lyon, France
2 Laboratory of Exercise Biology (BAPS), Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand, France
3 UR Physiologie et Physiopathologie de l'Exercice et Handicap
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: nicolas.peyrot{at}univ-st-etienne.fr.
Net metabolic cost of walking normalized by body mass, BM, (CW.BM-1, in J.kg-1.m-1) is greater in obese than in normal-weight individuals, and biomechanical differences could be responsible for this greater net metabolic cost. We hypothesized that in obese individuals, greater mediolateral body center of mass (COM) displacement and lower recovery of mechanical energy could induce an increase in the external mechanical work required to lift and accelerate the COM, and thus in net CW.BM-1. Body composition and standing metabolic rate were measured in 23 obese and 10 normal-weight adolescents. Metabolic and mechanical energy costs were assessed while walking along an outdoor track at four speeds (0.75-1.50 m.s-1). Three-dimensional COM accelerations were measured by means of a tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope, and integrated twice to obtain COM velocities, displacements, and fluctuations in potential and kinetic energies. Lastly, external mechanical work (J.kg-1.m-1), mediolateral COM displacement and the mechanical energy recovery of the inverted pendulum were calculated. Results: Net CW.BM-1 was 25% higher in obese than in normal-weight subjects on average across speeds, and net CW.BM-0.67 (J.kg-0.67.m-1) was significantly related to percent body fat (r2=0.46). However, recovery of mechanical energy and the external work performed (J.kg-1.m-1) were similar in the two groups. The mediolateral displacement was greater in obese subjects and significantly related to percent body fat (r2=0.64). The mediolateral COM displacement, likely due to greater step width, was significantly related to net CW.BM-0.67 (r2=0.49). Conclusions: We speculate that the greater net CW.BM-0.67 in obese subjects may be partially explained by the greater step-to-step transition costs (Wint,dc) associated with wide gait during walking.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. C. Browning and R. Kram Pound for pound: Working out how obesity influences the energetics of walking J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2009; 106(6): 1755 - 1756. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |