Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 20, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91191.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/1/29    most recent
91191.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masè, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ravelli, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masè, M.
Right arrow Articles by Ravelli, F.
Submitted on September 5, 2008
Revised on October 13, 2008
Accepted on November 11, 2008

Cardiorespiratory interactions in patients with atrial flutter

Michela Masè1*, Marcello Disertori2, and Flavia Ravelli1

1 University of Trento
2 S. Chiara Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: mase{at}science.unitn.it.

Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) is generally known as the autonomically-mediated modulation of the sinus node pacemaker frequency in synchrony with respiration. Cardiorespiratory interactions have been largely investigated during sinus rhythm, while little is known during reentrant arrhythmias. In this study cardiorespiratory interactions at the atrial and ventricular level were investigated during atrial flutter, a supraventricular arrhythmia based on a reentry, by cross-spectral analysis and computer modeling. The coherence and phase between respiration and atrial ({gamma}2AA, {varphi}AA) and ventricular ({gamma}2RR, {varphi}RR) interval series were estimated in 20 patients with typical atrial flutter (68.0 ± 8.8 years) and some degree of atrioventricular (AV) conduction block. In all patients atrial intervals displayed oscillations strongly coupled and in phase with respiration ({gamma}2AA = 0.97 ± 0.05, {varphi}AA = 0.71 ± 0.31 rad), corresponding to a paradoxical lengthening of intervals during inspiration. The modulation pattern was frequency-independent, with in phase oscillations and short time delays (0.40 ± 0.15 s) for respiratory frequencies in the range 0.1-0.4 Hz. Ventricular patterns were affected by AV conduction type. In patients with fixed AV conduction, ventricular intervals displayed oscillations strongly coupled ({gamma}2RR = 0.97 ± 0.03) and in phase with respiration ({varphi}RR = 1.08 ± 0.80 rad). Differently, in patients with variable AV conduction, respiratory oscillations were secondary to Wencheback rhythmicity, resulting in a decreased level of coupling ({gamma}2RR = 0.50 ± 0.21). Simulations with a simplified model of AV conduction showed ventricular patterns to originate from the combination of a respiratory modulated atrial input with the functional properties of the AV node. The paradoxical frequency-independent modulation pattern of atrial interval, the short time delays and the complexity of ventricular rhythm characterize respiratory arrhythmia during AFL and distinguish it from normal RSA. These peculiar features can be explained assuming a direct mechanical action of respiration on AFL reentrant circuit.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.