Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 13, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91123.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/1/40    most recent
91123.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heymsfield, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Pietrobelli, A.
Submitted on August 21, 2008
Revised on November 10, 2008
Accepted on November 11, 2008

Differences Between Brain Mass and Body Weight Scaling to Height: Potential Mechanism of Reduced Mass-Specific Resting Energy Expenditure of Taller Adults

Steven B. Heymsfield1*, Thamrong Chirachariyavej2, Im Joo Rhyu3, Chulaporn Roongpisuthipong2, Moonseong Heo4, and Angelo Pietrobelli5

1 Merck & Co.
2 Ramathibodi Hospital
3 Korea University
4 Albert Einstein College of Medicine
5 Verona University Medical School

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: steven_heymsfield{at}merck.com.

Adult resting energy expenditure (REE) scales as height~1.5 while body weight (BW) scales as height~2. Mass-specific REE (i.e., REE/BW) is thus lower in tall subjects compared to their shorter counterparts, the mechanism of which is unknown. We evaluated the hypothesis that high metabolic rate brain mass scales to height with a power significantly less than that of BW, a theory that if valid would provide a potential mechanism for height-related REE effects. The hypothesis was tested by measuring brain mass on a large (n=372) post-mortem sample of Thai men. As brain mass-body size relations may be influenced by age, the hypothesis was secondarily explored in Thai men ≤ age 45 yrs (n=299) and with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in Korean men (n=30) age ≥20<30 yrs. The scaling of large body compartments was examined in a third group of Asian men living in New York (NY, n=28) with MRI and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Brain mass scaled to height with a power (X±SEE; 0.46±0.13) significantly smaller (p<0.001) than that of BW scaled to height (2.36±0.19) in the whole group of Thai men; brain mass/BW scaled negatively to height (-1.94±0.20, p<0.001). Similar results were observed in younger Thai men and results for brain mass/BW vs. height were directionally the same (p=0.09) in Korean men. Skeletal muscle and bone scaled to height with powers similar to that of BW (i.e., ~2-3) in the NY Asian men. Models developed using REE estimates in Thai men suggest that brain accounts for most of the REE/BW height dependency. Tall and short men thus differ in relative brain mass but the proportions of BW as large compartments appear independent of height, observations that provide a potential mechanistic basis for related differences in REE and that have implications for the study of adult energy requirements.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.