Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 12, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91099.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/2/678    most recent
91099.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foster, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, B. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foster, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Butler, B. D.
Submitted on August 15, 2008
Revised on December 11, 2008
Accepted on December 11, 2008

Decompression to altitude: assumptions, experimental evidence and future directions

Philip P. Foster1* and Bruce D. Butler2

1 University of Texas Medical Branch
2 University of Texas Medical School

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ppfoster{at}utmb.edu.

Although differences exist, hypobaric and hyperbaric exposures share common physiological, biochemical and clinical features and their comparison may provide further insight into the mechanisms of decompression stress. Although altitude decompression illness (DCI) has been experienced by high-altitude Air Force pilots and is common in ground-based experiments simulating decompression profiles of extravehicular activities (EVA's) or astronauts' space walks, no case has been reported during actual EVA's in the non weight-bearing microgravity environment of orbital Space Missions. We are uncertain whether gravity influences decompression outcomes via nitrogen tissue wash-out or via alterations related to skeletal muscle activity. However, robust experimental evidence demonstrated the role of skeletal muscle exercise, activities and/or movement in bubble formation and DCI occurrence. Dualism of effects of exercise, positive or negative, on bubble formation and DCI is a striking feature in hypobaric exposure. Therefore, the discussion and the structure of this review are centered on those highlighted unresolved topics about the relationship between muscle activity, decompression and microgravity. This article also provides, in the context of altitude decompression, an overview of the role of denitrogenation, metabolic gases, gas micronuclei, stabilization of bubbles, biochemical pathways activated by bubbles, nitric oxide, oxygen, anthropometric or physiological variables, Doppler-detectable bubbles and potential arterialization of bubbles. These findings and uncertainties will produce further physiological challenges to solve in order to line up for the programmed human return to the Moon, the preparation for human exploration of Mars and the EVA's implementation in a non-zero gravity environment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. R. Pendergast and C. E. G. Lundgren
The physiology and pathophysiology of the hyperbaric and diving environments
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 274 - 275.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.