Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 19, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.91056.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/5/1604    most recent
91056.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tiainen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rantanen, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tiainen, K.
Right arrow Articles by Rantanen, T.
Submitted on August 6, 2008
Revised on February 19, 2009
Accepted on February 19, 2009

Genetic and environmental effects on isometric muscle strength and leg extensor power followed up for three years among older female twins

Kristina Tiainen1*, Sarianna Sipilä2, Markku Kauppinen3, Jaakko Kaprio4, and Taina Rantanen3

1 University of Tampere
2 University of Jyvaskylä,
3 University of Jyväskylä
4 University of Helsinki

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kristina.tiainen{at}uta.fi.

Purpose of this study was to examine changes in contribution of genetic and environmental effects to isometric knee extensor strength and leg extensor power among 63 to76-year-old female twins over a three-year follow-up. At baseline in 2000 the sample comprised 206 monozygotic (MZ) and 228 dizygotic (DZ) twin individuals and at follow-up in 2003 149 MZ and 164 DZ twin individuals. Genetic modeling showed that genetic effects explained 58% (95% CI 46-68%) of the variance in muscle strength at baseline and 56% (95% CI 41-68%) at follow-up with no occasion-specific genetic effect. Non-shared environmental effects accounted for 42% (95% CI 32-54%) of the variation at baseline and 15% (95% CI 7-26%) at follow-up. In addition, new non-shared environmental effects explained the remaining variance, 29% (95% CI 22-37%) of muscle strength at follow-up. For muscle power, same genetic effects accounted for 67% (95% CI 57-74%) of the variation at baseline and 48% (95% CI 34-61%) at follow-up. Non-shared environmental effects in common at both measurement points explained 33% (95% CI 25-43%) of the total variation at baseline and 11% (95% CI 5-21%) at follow-up. Remaining variance of muscle power at follow-up was accounted for by time-specific environmental effects. Results indicated that contribution of genetic effects to isometric muscle strength was stable, whereas for leg extensor power the proportion of genetic effects decreased during the follow-up. We observed new specific environmental effects underlying follow-up muscle strength and power, which effects could be due to the onset of new disease processes or changes in lifestyle.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.