Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 4, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90882.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/5/1462    most recent
90882.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yeo, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hawley, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yeo, W. K.
Right arrow Articles by Hawley, J. A.
Submitted on July 9, 2008
Revised on August 13, 2008
Accepted on August 29, 2008

Skeletal muscle adaptation and performance responses to once a day versus twice every second day endurance training regimens

Wee Kian Yeo1, Carl D. Paton2, Andrew P. Garnham3, Louise M. Burke4, Andrew Carey1, and John A. Hawley1*

1 RMIT University
2 Eastern Institute of Technology
3 Deakin University
4 Australian Institute of Sport

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: john.hawley{at}rmit.edu.au.

We determined the effects of a cycle training program in which selected sessions were performed with low muscle glycogen content on training capacity and subsequent endurance performance, whole-body substrate oxidation during submaximal exercise, and several mitochondrial enzymes and signaling proteins with putative roles in promoting training adaptation. Seven endurance-trained cyclists/triathletes trained daily (HIGH) alternating between 100 min steady-state aerobic rides (AT) one day, followed by a high-intensity interval training session (HIT; 8 x 5 min at maximum self-selected effort) the next day. Another 7 subjects trained twice every second day (LOW), first undertaking AT, then 1-2 hr later, the HIT. These training schedules were maintained for 3 wk. Forty-eight hr before and after the first and last training sessions, all subjects completed a 60-min steady-state ride (60SS) followed by a 60-min performance trial. Muscle biopsies were taken before and after 60SS and rates of substrate oxidation were determined throughout this ride. Resting muscle glycogen concentration (412 ± 51 vs. 577±34 µmol•g-1 d.w.), rates of whole-body fat oxidation during 60SS (1261 ± 247 vs. 1698 ± 174 µmol•kg-1•60 min-1), the maximal activities of citrate synthase (45 ± 2 vs. 54 ± 1 mmol•kg-1•min-1 d.w) and {beta}-hydroxyacyl-CoA-dehydrogenase (18 ± 2 vs. 23 ± 2 mmol•kg-1•min-1 d.w) along with the total protein content of cytochrome c oxidase subunit IV were increased only in LOW (all p<0.05). Mitochondrial DNA content and PGC-1{alpha} protein levels were unchanged in both groups after training. Cycling performance improved by ~10% in both LOW and HIGH. We conclude that compared to training daily, training twice every second day compromised high-intensity training capacity. While selected markers of training adaptation were enhanced with twice-a-day training, the performance of a 1 hr time-trial undertaken after a 60 min steady-state ride was similar after once daily or twice every second day training programs.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.