Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (December 4, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90853.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/2/729    most recent
90853.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etzion, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etzion, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Grossman, Y.
Submitted on July 3, 2008
Revised on October 30, 2008
Accepted on November 26, 2008

Differential modulation of cerebellar climbing fiber and parallel fiber synaptic responses at high pressure

Yoram Etzion1, Amir Mor1*, and Yoram Grossman1

1 Ben-Gurion University of the Negev

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: morami12{at}gmail.com.

High pressure, which induces central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction (high pressure neurological syndrome - HPNS) depresses synaptic transmission at all synapses examined to date. Several lines of evidence indicate an inhibitory effect of pressure on Ca2+ entry into the presynaptic terminal. In the present work we studied for the first time the effect of pressure on the cerebellar climbing fibers (CF) synaptic responses. Pressure modulation of cerebellar synaptic plasticity was tested both in the CF and parallel fibers (PF) pathways using paired pulse protocols. CF synapses which normally operate at a high baseline release probability, demonstrate paired pulse depression (PPD). High pressure reduced CF synaptic responses at 5.1 MPa and 10.1 MPa, but did not affect its PPD. High [Ca2+]o could not antagonize the effect of pressure on the CF response, whereas low [Ca2+]o in contrast to pressure, decreased both the response amplitude and the observed PPD. PF synapses which usually operate at low release probability, exhibit paired pulse facilitation (PPF). Pressure increased PF PPF at all inter stimulus intervals (ISIs) tested (20 - 200 ms). Several Ca2+ channel blockers as well as low [Ca2+]o could mimic the effect of pressure on the PF response, but significantly increased the PPF only at 20 ms ISI. These results, together with previous data, show that the CF synapse is relatively resistant to pressure. The lack of pressure effect on CF PPD is surprising, and may suggest that the PPD is not directly linked to synaptic depletion, as generally suggested. The increase in PPF of the PF at pressure which is mimicked by Ca2+ channel blockers or low [Ca2+]o further support pressure involvement in synaptic release mechanism(s). These results also indicate that pressure effects may be selective for various types of synapses in the CNS.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.