Journal of Applied Physiology AJP citation statistics
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 20, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90737.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/1/311    most recent
90737.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gröger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Radermacher, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gröger, M.
Right arrow Articles by Radermacher, P.
Submitted on June 9, 2008
Revised on November 9, 2008
Accepted on November 12, 2008

DNA damage after long-term repetitive hyperbaric oxygen exposure

Michael Gröger1, Sükrü Öter2, Vladislava Simkova1, Markus Bolten3, Andreas Koch3, Volker Warninghoff3, Michael Georgieff1, Claus-Martin Muth1, Günter Speit1, and Peter Radermacher4*

1 Universitaetsklinikum, Ulm, Germany
2 Gülhane Askeri Tip Akademisi, Ankara, Turkey
3 Schifffahrtmedizinisches Institut der Marine, Kronshagen, Germany
4 Universitaetsklinikum

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: peter.radermacher{at}uni-ulm.de.

A single exposure to hyperbaric oxygen (HBO), i.e. pure oxygen breathing at supra-atmospheric pressures causes oxidative DNA base damage both in humans in vivo as well in isolated lymphocytes of human volunteers. This DNA damage, however, is rapidly repaired, and an adaptive protection against further HBO is triggered. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis whether long-term repetitive exposure to HBO would modify the degree of DNA damage. In addition to the measurement of blood antioxidant enzyme activities, the ratio of the oxidized and reduced glutathione content and the level of DNA damage (tail moment in the comet assay) we assessed the DNA damage and superoxide radical (O2.-) production induced by a single ex vivo HBO-exposure of isolated lymphocytes. All parameters of oxidative stress and antioxidative capacity in vivo were comparable in the four different groups. Exposure to HBO increased both DNA damage in lymphocytes and O2.- production, and this response was significantly more pronounced in the cells obtained from the combat swimmers than in all the other groups. However, in all groups DNA damage was completely repaired within one hours, possibly indicating a higher efficiency of DNA repair in combat swimmers than in the other groups. We conclude that at least in healthy volunteers with endurance training, long-term repetitive exposure to HBO does not modify the basal blood antioxidant capacity or the basal incidence of DNA strand breaks. The increased ex vivo HBO-related DNA damage in isolated lymphocytes from these subjects, however, may reflect enhanced susceptibility to oxidative DNA damage, which is, in turn, more efficiently repaired.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.