Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 15, 2009). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90726.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/3/823    most recent
90726.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Singhal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cureton, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Singhal, A.
Right arrow Articles by Cureton, K. J.
Submitted on June 5, 2008
Revised on January 13, 2009
Accepted on January 14, 2009

Effect of intensity of resistance exercise on postprandial lipemia

Arpit Singhal1*, Jennifer L. Trilk1, Nathan T. Jenkins2, Kevin A. Bigelman1, and Kirk J. Cureton1

1 University of Georgia
2 University of Maryland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: arpit280{at}gmail.com.

PURPOSE: To determine if moderate-intensity resistance exercise (MOD) lowers postprandial lipemia (PPL) as much as high-intensity resistance exercise (HI) of equal work. METHODS: Ten healthy men performed three trials, each conducted over 2 d. On Day 1 of each treatment, they either did not exercise (CON), performed 3 sets of 16 repetitions of 10 exercises at 50% of 8-repetition maximum (MOD), or performed 3 sets of 8 repetitions of 10 exercises at 100% of 8-repetition maximum (HI). On the morning of day 2 at 15.5 h post-exercise, participants ate a high-fat meal. Venous blood samples were collected and metabolic rate was measured at rest and 3 h postprandial. RESULTS: HI reduced fasting triglyceride (TG) and TG area-under-the-curve (AUC) (36%, p = .011 and 35%, p = .014) compared with CON. MOD tended to reduce fasting TG and TG AUC (21%, p = .054 and 26%, p =.052) compared with CON, but MOD and HI did not differ in fasting TG or TG AUC. Incremental TG AUC did not differ among treatments. MOD and HI did not change resting metabolic rate. HI increased fat oxidation at rest (21%, p = .021) and at 3 h postprandial (39%, p = 0.009) relative to CON. MOD tended to increase fat oxidation at rest (18%, p = .060) relative to CON. Fat oxidation and metabolic rate did not differ in MOD and HI. MOD and HI increased the fasting QUICKI insulin sensitivity index (4%, p = 0.001 and p = 0.004) relative to CON. CONCLUSION: As MOD and HI resulted in similar reductions in PPL and increases in fat oxidation, resistance exercise intensity does not influence PPL.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.