Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Neurophysiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 13, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90701.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/2/403    most recent
90701.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hortobagyi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hallett, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hortobagyi, T.
Right arrow Articles by Hallett, M.
Submitted on May 29, 2008
Revised on November 5, 2008
Accepted on November 9, 2008

Chronic low-frequency rTMS of the primary motor cortex diminishes exercise training-induced gains in maximal voluntary force in humans

Tibor Hortobagyi1*, Sarah Pirio Richardson2, Mikhael Lomarev3, Ejaz Shamim4, Sabine Meunier4, Heike Russman5, Nguyet Dang4, and Mark Hallett6

1 East Carolina University,
2 University of New Mexico
3 The Bekhterev Neuropsychological Institute
4 The National Institute of Health
5 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois
6 National Institutes of Health

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: hortobagyit{at}ecu.edu.

Although there is consensus that the central nervous system mediates the increases in maximal voluntary force (MVC) produced by resistance exercise, the involvement of the primary motor cortex (M1) in these processes remains controversial. We hypothesized that 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of M1 during resistance training would diminish strength gains. Forty subjects were divided equally into 5 groups. Subjects voluntarily (VOL) abducted the first dorsal interosseus (FDI) (5 bouts x 10 repetitions, 10 sessions, 4 weeks) at 70-80% MVC. Another group also exercised but in the 1-minute-long inter-bout rest intervals received rTMS (VOL+rTMS, 1 Hz, FDI motor area, 300 pulses per session, 120% of the resting motor threshold, rMT). Group 3 also exercised and received sham rTMS (VOL+SHAM). Group 4 received only rTMS (rTMS_only). The 37.5% and 33.3% gains in MVC in VOL and VOL+SHAM, respectively, were greater (p = 0.001) than the 18.9% gain in VOL+rTMS, 1.9% in rTMS_only, and 2.6% in unexercised Controls who received no stimulation. Acutely, within Sessions 5 and 10, single-pulse TMS revealed that motor evoked potential size and recruitment curve slopes were reduced in VOL+rTMS and rTMS_only and accumulated to chronic reductions by Session 10. There were no changes in rMT, maximum compound action potential amplitude (Mmax), and peripherally evoked twitch forces in the trained FDI and the untrained abductor digiti minimi. Although contributions from spinal sources cannot be excluded, the data suggest that M1 may play a role in mediating neural adaptations to strength training.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.