Journal of Applied Physiology Millar Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (July 10, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90619.2008 Free Article
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/4/1028    most recent
90619.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A. A
Right arrow Articles by Romanovsky, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Steiner, A. A
Right arrow Articles by Romanovsky, A. A.
Submitted on May 6, 2008
Revised on July 7, 2008
Accepted on July 9, 2008

Nicotine administration and withdrawal affect survival in systemic inflammation models

Alexandre A Steiner1, Daniela L Oliveira, Jennifer L Roberts, Scott R. Petersen, and Andrej A. Romanovsky2*

1 Albany College of Pharmacy
2 St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: aromano{at}chw.edu.

How different regimens of nicotine administration and withdrawal affect systemic inflammation is largely unknown. We studied the effects of chronic and acute nicotine administration and of nicotine withdrawal on the outcome of aseptic and septic systemic inflammation. Male C57BL/6 mice were implanted with subcutaneous osmotic pumps (to deliver nicotine) and intrabrain telemetry probes (to measure temperature). Aseptic inflammation was induced by lipopolysaccharide (40 mg/kg, intraperitoneally); sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture. The chronic nicotine administration group received nicotine (28 mg/kg/d) for 2 weeks before the induction of inflammation and continued receiving nicotine until the end of the experiment; the acute nicotine administration group received saline for 2 weeks and nicotine thereafter; the nicotine withdrawal group received nicotine for 2 weeks and saline thereafter; the no nicotine group was infused with saline throughout the experiment. Compared to no nicotine, the chronic nicotine administration did not affect survival in either model of inflammation, possibly due to the development of nicotine tolerance. The acute nicotine administration increased the survival rate in aseptic inflammation from 11 to 33% (possibly by suppressing inflammation), but worsened the outcome of sepsis (possibly because the suppression of inflammation promoted microbial proliferation). Oppositely to acute nicotine, nicotine withdrawal increased the survival rate in sepsis from 18 to 40%. The effects on survival were not due to changes in body temperature. We conclude that acute nicotine administration and nicotine withdrawal affect survival in systemic inflammation, and that these effects strongly depend on whether inflammation is aseptic or septic.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE LITERATURE
Physiology, December 1, 2008; 23(6): 310 - 312.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
M. P. Miles
How do we solve the puzzle of unintended consequences of inflammation? Systematically
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2008; 105(4): 1023 - 1025.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.