Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (July 3, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90599.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/3/854    most recent
90599.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kacmarek, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Kacmarek, R. M.
Submitted on May 1, 2008
Revised on June 19, 2008
Accepted on June 29, 2008

The Principle of Upper Airway Unidirectional Flow Facilitates Breathing in Humans

Yandong Jiang1, Yafen Liang1, and Robert M. Kacmarek1*

1 Massachusetts General Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rkacmarek{at}partners.org.

Upper airway unidirectional breathing, nose in and mouth out, is used by panting dogs to facilitate heat removal via water evaporation from the respiratory system. Why some humans instinctively employ the same breathing pattern during respiratory distress is still open to question. We hypothesized that 1) humans unconsciously perform unidirectional breathing because it improves breathing efficiency; 2) such an improvement is achieved by bypassing upper airway dead space and 3) the magnitude of the improvement is inversely proportional to the tidal volume. Four breathing patterns were performed in random order in 10 healthy volunteers first with normal breathing effort, then with variable tidal volumes: mouth in and mouth out (MMB); nose in and nose out (NNB); nose in and mouth out (NMB); and mouth in and nose out (MNB). We found that unidirectional breathing bypasses anatomical dead space and improves breathing efficiency. At tidal volumes of about 380 ml, the functional anatomical dead space during NMB (81±31 ml) or MNB (101±20 ml) was significantly lower than that during MMB (148±15 ml) or NNB (130±13 ml) (all p<0.001) and the breathing efficiency obtained with NMB (78±9%) or MNB (73±6%) was significantly higher than that with MMB (61±6%) or NNB (66±3%) (all p<0.001). The improvement in breathing efficiency increased as tidal volume decreased. Unidirectional breathing results in a significant reduction in functional anatomical dead space and improvement in breathing efficiency. We suggest this may be the reason that such a breathing pattern is preferred during respiratory distress.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
E. Hillegass
Breathing retraining for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - a role for clinicians
Chronic Respiratory Disease, February 1, 2009; 6(1): 43 - 44.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.