Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (September 11, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90586.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/5/1527    most recent
90586.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cresswell, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oya, T.
Right arrow Articles by Cresswell, A. G.
Submitted on April 28, 2008
Revised on September 8, 2008
Accepted on September 9, 2008

Corticospinal evoked responses in lower limb muscles during voluntary contractions at varying strengths

Tomomichi Oya1, Ben Wayne Hoffman1, and Andrew G. Cresswell1*

1 The University of Queensland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: a.cresswell{at}uq.edu.au.

This study investigated corticospinal evoked responses in lower limb muscles during voluntary contractions at varying strengths. Similar investigations have been made on upper limb muscles, where evoked responses have been shown to increase up to ~50% of maximal force and then decline. We elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) in the soleus (SOL) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles using magnetic stimulation over the motor cortex and cervicomedullary junction during voluntary plantar flexions with the torque ranging from 0 to 100% of a maximal voluntary contraction. Differences between the MEP and CMEP were also investigated to assess whether any changes were occurring at the cortical or spinal levels. In both SOL and MG, MEP and CMEP amplitudes (normalized to Mmax) showed an increase, followed by a plateau, over the greater part of the contraction range with responses increasing from ~0.2 to ~6% of Mmax for SOL, and ~0.3 to ~10% of Mmax for MG, respectively. As both MEPs and CMEPs changed in a similar manner, the observed increase and lack of decrease at high force levels are likely related to underlying changes occurring at the spinal level. The evoked responses in the SOL and MG increase over a greater range of contraction strengths than for upper limb muscles, probably due to differences in the pattern of motor unit recruitment and rate coding for these muscles and the strength of the corticospinal input.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. W. Hoffman, T. Oya, T. J. Carroll, and A. G. Cresswell
Increases in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal plantar flexion
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 2009; 107(1): 112 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.