Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 26, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90506.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/2/494    most recent
90506.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sasson, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goodman, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sasson, Z.
Submitted on April 8, 2008
Revised on November 6, 2008
Accepted on November 20, 2008

Left Ventricular Contractile Function is Preserved During Prolonged Exercise in Middle-Aged Men

Jack M. Goodman1*, Gian-Marco Busato1, Elizabeth Frey1, and Zion Sasson2

1 University of Toronto
2 Mt. Sinai Hospital

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jack.goodman{at}utoronto.ca.

We examined left ventricular (LV) function before, during and following prolonged exercise (EX) in 12 healthy middle-aged men (mean±sem: age=43.5±1.9; VO2max =51.7±1.5 ml.kg-1.min-1). Subjects cycled for 120 minutes at 65%VO2max(75% of maximal heart rate}. 2-D echocardiography (ECHO was used to determine tissue-Doppler longitudinal myocardial strain and strain rate, LV ejection fraction (EF) , end-diastolic (EDV),end-systolic (ESV) and stroke volume (SV)at baseline and after 5, 30 and 120 min of EX, and following 30 min of recovery. In addition, hematocrit and plasma norepinephrine (NE) were measured. RESULTS: From Baseline to 5 min of EX, there were significant increases in LV longitudinal strain (-23.20±0.87% to -27.63±1.07%, p<0.01), strain rate (-1.50±0.15 s-1 to -2.08±0.14 s-1, p<0.01), and EF (56.3±2.2% to 77.1±1.0%, p<0.05)with continued increases by both at 30 min of exercise versus SV, EDV and ESV, which remained constant. After 120 min of EX, HR and NE increased further with reductions in SV, cardiac output and systolic blood pressure without changes in strain or strain rate. EDV decreased after 120 min EX (-9.2% vs. 30 min value; p=0.05) along with a hemoconcentration (baseline=41.3±1.0% vs EX=45.1±1.2%, p<0001) and significant reduction in body mass despite a mean fluid consumption of 1.8±0.2 L throughout EX. Following 30 min of recovery, LV longitudinal strain was depressed relative to baseline (-23.20±0.87% to -19.57±1.21%, p<0.01). Following 30 min of recovery, LV longitudinal strain was depressed relative to baseline (-23.20±0.87% to -19.57±1.21%, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: The reduction in LV SV during prolonged EX occurred without changes in the LV contractile state and is likely secondary to reduced LV preload. A reduction in LV contractility in spite of a reduced afterload following exercise may be due to factors unique to the recovery period and do not appear to contribute to a reduction in SV during prolonged exercise.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.