Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 13, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90449.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/1/302    most recent
90449.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lott, M. E.J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinoway, L. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lott, M. E.J.
Right arrow Articles by Sinoway, L. I.
Submitted on March 25, 2008
Revised on October 31, 2008
Accepted on November 10, 2008

Vasoconstrictor Responses in the Upper and Lower Limbs to Increases in Transmural Pressure

Mary E.J. Lott1, Cynthia Hogeman1, Michael Herr1, Monica Bhagat1, Allen Kunselman2, and Lawrence I. Sinoway1*

1 Penn State Heart & Vascular Institute
2 Pennsylvania State University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lsinoway{at}hmc.psu.edu.

The purpose of this study was to examine upper and lower limb vasoconstrictor responses to changes in transmural pressure in humans. Brachial and femoral blood mean blood velocity (MBV) and vessel diameter (Doppler Ultrasound) were measured in 20 supine healthy subjects (10 men and 10 women; 27 ± 1 yr; mean ± SE) during four levels of limb suction at -25, -50, -75, and -100 mmHg, respectively. Limb suction led to an initial rise in MBV followed by a rapid fall in flow velocity to a level below MBV baseline indicating a vasoconstriction effect. Femoral compared to brachial vessels exhibited a greater fall in flow velocity at all levels of suction (-89 ±17 vs. -10 ± 2, -142 ± 11 vs. -14 ± 2, -156 ± 22 vs. -13 ± 2, -162 ± 29 vs. -12 ± 2 ml/min for -25, -50, -75, -100 mmHg, respectively; Interaction Effect, P < 0.05). Even at low tank suction levels (i.e. -10 and -20 mmHg), significant brachial flow velocity vasoconstriction from baseline values was demonstrated reflecting downstream resistance vessel changes (n=14). Brachial and femoral diameters did not change during changes in negative tank pressure. During suction, changes in limb volumes were significantly greater in the forearm (1.4 ± 0.5%, 2.4 ± 0.8%, 3.5 ± 1.0%, 4.3 ± 1.1 %) compared to the calf (0.9 ± 0.5%, 1.4 ± 0.7%, 2.0 ± 0.8%, 2.8 ± 1.1%) at all levels of negative tank pressures (-25, -50, -75, -100 mmHg respectively). Simultaneous measurements of both upper limbs and both lower limbs suggested that the majority of the reduction in flow was due to myogenic influences except when -100 mmHg of suction was applied to the lower limb. The greater vasoconstriction responses in the leg compared to the arm with suction appear to be influenced by both myogenic and sympathetic mechanisms.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.