Journal of Applied Physiology AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (November 26, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90333.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
106/4/1394    most recent
90333.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howarth, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gibala, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howarth, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gibala, M. J.
Submitted on February 27, 2008
Revised on November 7, 2008
Accepted on November 21, 2008

Co-ingestion of protein with carbohydrate during recovery from endurance exercise stimulates skeletal muscle protein synthesis in humans

Krista Roylene Howarth1, Natalie A. Moreau1, Stuart M. Phillips1, and Martin Joseph Gibala1*

1 McMaster University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gibalam{at}mcmaster.ca.

Co-ingestion of protein with carbohydrate (CHO) during recovery from exercise can affect muscle glycogen synthesis, particularly if CHO intake is suboptimal. Another potential benefit of protein feeding is an increased synthesis rate of muscle proteins, as well documented after resistance exercise. In contrast, the effect of nutrient manipulation on muscle protein kinetics after aerobic exercise remains largely unexplored. We tested the hypothesis that ingesting protein with CHO after a standardized 2 h bout of cycle exercise would increase mixed muscle fractional synthetic rate (FSR) and whole body net protein balance (WBNB) versus trials matched for total CHO or total energy intake. We also examined whether post-exercise glycogen synthesis could be enhanced by adding protein or additional CHO to a feeding protocol that provided 1.2 g CHO.kg-1.h-1, which is the rate generally recommended to maximize this process. Six active men ingested drinks during the first three h of recovery that provided either 1.2 g CHO.kg-1.h-1 (L-CHO), 1.2 g CHO +0.4 g PRO.kg-1.h-1 (PRO-CHO) or 1.6 g CHO.kg-1.h-1 (H-CHO) in random order. Based on a primed constant infusion of L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine, analysis of biopsies (v. lateralis) obtained at 0 and 4 h of recovery showed that muscle FSR was higher (p<0.05) in PRO-CHO (0.09±0.01 %.h-1) versus both L-CHO (0.07±0.01 %.h-1) and H-CHO (0.06±0.01 %.h-1). WBNB assessed using 1-13C-leucine, was positive only during PRO-CHO and this was mainly attributable to a reduced rate of protein breakdown. Glycogen synthesis rate was not different between trials. We conclude that ingesting protein with CHO during recovery from aerobic exercise increased muscle FSR and improved WBNB, as compared to feeding strategies that provided CHO only matched for total CHO or total energy intake. However, adding protein or additional CHO to a feeding strategy that provided 1.2 g CHO.kg-1.h-1 did not further enhance glycogen resynthesis during recovery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. R. Rodriguez
Making room for protein in approaches to muscle recovery from endurance exercise
J Appl Physiol, April 1, 2009; 106(4): 1036 - 1037.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.