|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Locomotor Performance Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology and Wellness, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas; 2Locomotion Laboratory, Kinesiology Department, Rice University, Houston, Texas; 3Biomechanics Laboratory, College of Health Sciences, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming; 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas; 5Biomechatronics Group, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 6School of Applied Physiology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia; 7Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado
Submitted 17 February 2009 ; accepted in final form 16 June 2009
The recent competitive successes of a bilateral, transtibial amputee sprint runner who races with modern running prostheses has triggered an international controversy regarding the relative function provided by his artificial limbs. Here, we conducted three tests of functional similarity between this amputee sprinter and competitive male runners with intact limbs: the metabolic cost of running, sprinting endurance, and running mechanics. Metabolic and mechanical data, respectively, were acquired via indirect calorimetry and ground reaction force measurements during constant-speed, level treadmill running. First, we found that the mean gross metabolic cost of transport of our amputee sprint subject (174.9 ml O2·kg–1·km–1; speeds: 2.5–4.1 m/s) was only 3.8% lower than mean values for intact-limb elite distance runners and 6.7% lower than for subelite distance runners but 17% lower than for intact-limb 400-m specialists [210.6 (SD 13.2) ml O2·kg–1·km–1]. Second, the speeds that our amputee sprinter maintained for six all-out, constant-speed trials to failure (speeds: 6.6–10.8 m/s; durations: 2–90 s) were within 2.2 (SD 0.6)% of those predicted for intact-limb sprinters. Third, at sprinting speeds of 8.0, 9.0, and 10.0 m/s, our amputee subject had longer foot-ground contact times [+14.7 (SD 4.2)%], shorter aerial [–26.4 (SD 9.9)%] and swing times [–15.2 (SD 6.9)%], and lower stance-averaged vertical forces [–19.3 (SD 3.1)%] than intact-limb sprinters [top speeds = 10.8 vs. 10.8 (SD 0.6) m/s]. We conclude that running on modern, lower-limb sprinting prostheses appears to be physiologically similar but mechanically different from running with intact limbs.
prosthetics; running economy; sprinting; running; fatigue; locomotion; biomechanics
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Grabowski, C. P. McGowan, W. J. McDermott, M. T. Beale, R. Kram, and H. M. Herr Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting Biol Lett, November 4, 2009; (2009) rsbl.2009.0729v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. E. di Prampero, D. Salvadego, S. Fusi, and B. Grassi A simple method for assessing the energy cost of running during incremental tests J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2009; 107(4): 1068 - 1075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |