Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 479-485, 2008. First published June 12, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01220.2007
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/2/479    most recent
01220.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LaPrad, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LaPrad, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Mitchell, H. W.

Maintenance of airway caliber in isolated airways by deep inspiration and tidal strains

Adam S. LaPrad,1 Adrian R. West,2 Peter B. Noble,2 Kenneth R. Lutchen,1 and Howard W. Mitchell2

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts; and 2Discipline of Physiology, School of Biomedical, Biomolecular, and Chemical Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

Submitted 15 November 2007 ; accepted in final form 6 June 2008

Deep inspirations (DIs) are large periodic breathing maneuvers that regulate airway caliber and prevent airway obstruction in vivo. This study characterized the intrinsic response of the intact airway to DI, isolated from parenchymal attachments and other in vivo interactions. Porcine isolated bronchial segments were constricted with carbachol and subjected to transmural pressures of 5–10 cmH2O at 0.25 Hz (tidal breathing) interspersed with single DIs of amplitude 5–20 cmH2O, 5–30 cmH2O, or 5–40 cmH2O (6-s duration) or DI of amplitude 5–30 cmH2O (30-s duration). Tidal breathing was ceased after DI in a subset of airways and in control airways in which no DI was performed. Luminal cross-sectional area was measured using a fiber-optic endoscope. Bronchodilation by DI was amplitude dependent; 5–20 cmH2O DIs produced less dilation than 5–30 cmH2O and 5–40 cmH2O DIs (P = 0.003 and 0.012, respectively). Effects of DI duration were not significant (P = 0.182). Renarrowing after DI followed a monoexponential decay function to pre-DI airway caliber with time constants between 27.4 ± 4.3 and 36.3 ± 6.9 s. However, when tidal breathing was ceased after DI, further bronchoconstriction occurred within 30s. This response was identical in both the presence and absence of DI (P = 0.919). We conclude that the normal bronchodilatory response to DI occurs as a result of the direct mechanical effects of DI on activated ASM in the airway wall. Further bronchoconstriction occurs by altering the airway wall stress following DI, demonstrating the importance of continual transient strains in maintaining airway caliber.

bronchodilation; airway smooth muscle; bronchial segments



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: A. S. LaPrad, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Boston Univ., 44 Cummington St., Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: alaprad{at}bu.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.