Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 463-472, 2008. First published June 5, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90398.2008
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/2/463    most recent
90398.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hunter, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ng, A. V.

Time to task failure and muscle activation vary with load type for a submaximal fatiguing contraction with the lower leg

Sandra K. Hunter, Tejin Yoon, Joseph Farinella, Erin E. Griffith, and Alexander V. Ng

Exercise Science Program, Department of Physical Therapy, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Submitted 12 March 2008 ; accepted in final form 3 June 2008

The purpose was to compare the time to failure and muscle activation patterns for a sustained isometric submaximal contraction with the dorsiflexor muscles when the foot was restrained to a force transducer (force task) compared with supporting an equivalent inertial load and unrestrained (position task). Fifteen men and women (mean ± SD; 21.1 ± 1.4 yr) performed the force and position tasks at 20% maximal voluntary contraction force until task failure. Maximal voluntary contraction force performed before the force and position tasks was similar (333 ± 71 vs. 334 ± 65 N), but the time to task failure was briefer for the position task (10.0 ± 6.2 vs. 21.3 ± 17.8 min, P < 0.05). The rate of increase in agonist root-mean-square electromyogram (EMG), EMG bursting activity, rating of perceived exertion, fluctuations in motor output, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate during the fatiguing contraction was greater for the position task. EMG activity of the vastus lateralis (lower leg stabilizer) and medial gastrocnemius (antagonist) increased more rapidly during the position task, but coactivation ratios (agonist vs. antagonist) were similar during the two tasks. Thus the difference in time to failure for the two tasks with the dorsiflexor muscles involved a greater level of neural activity and rate of motor unit recruitment during the position task, but did not involve a difference in coactivation. These findings have implications for rehabilitation and ergonomics in minimizing fatigue during prolonged activation of the dorsiflexor muscles.

muscle fatigue; load compliance; coactivation; antagonist activation; tibialis anterior



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: S. K. Hunter, Dept. of Physical Therapy, Marquette Univ., P. O. Box 1881, Milwaukee, WI 53201 (e-mail: Sandra.Hunter{at}marquette.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.