Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 105: 417-419, 2008. First published June 26, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.90529.2008 Free Article
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Free upon publication Free Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
105/2/417    most recent
90529.2008v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lundby, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robach, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lundby, C.
Right arrow Articles by Robach, P.

Testing for recombinant human erythropoietin in urine: problems associated with current anti-doping testing

Carsten Lundby, Niels J. Achman-Andersen, Jonas J. Thomsen, Anne M. Norgaard, and Paul Robach

Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark

Submitted 16 April 2008 ; accepted in final form 11 June 2008

Background: the main action of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEpo) is to increase the oxygen carrying capacity of the blood. To prevent a possible misuse of rHuEpo, this is tested in urine samples collected from athletes by World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA)-accredited laboratories. Recently the test has met serious critiques, and the aims of the present study were to investigate the detection power of the test as well as the variability in the test power comparing the results of two WADA-accredited laboratories. Methods: eight human subjects were studied for 7 wk and treated with rHuEpo for 4 wk with 2 wk of "boosting" followed by 2 wk of "maintenance" and a post period of 3 wk. Urine samples were obtained during all periods. Results: laboratory A determined rHuEpo misuse in all subjects during the boosting period, whereas laboratory B found no misuse, with one sample to be negative, and the remaining seven to be suspicious. The detection rates decreased throughout the maintenance and post period when total hemoglobin mass and exercise performance were elevated. During this period, laboratory A found only two of 24 samples to be positive and three to be suspicious, and laboratory B found no positive or suspicious samples. Conclusion: this study demonstrates a poor agreement in test results comparing two WADA-accredited laboratories. Moreover, after the initial rHuEpo boosting period the power to detect rHuEpo misuse during the maintenance and post periods appears minimal.

doping; detection; exercise



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: C. Lundby, Copenhagen Muscle Research Centre, Rigshospitalet section 7652, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark (e-mail: lundby{at}idraet.au.dk)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BloodHome page
P. Robach, S. Recalcati, D. Girelli, C. Gelfi, N. J. Aachmann-Andersen, J. J. Thomsen, A. M. Norgaard, A. Alberghini, N. Campostrini, A. Castagna, et al.
Alterations of systemic and muscle iron metabolism in human subjects treated with low-dose recombinant erythropoietin
Blood, June 25, 2009; 113(26): 6707 - 6715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Lippi, G. Banfi, J. Morkeberg, B. Belhage, R. Damsgaard, and V. Skibeli
Comments on Delanghe and Joyner's editorial "testing for recombinant human erythropoietin".
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1990 - 1991.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
G. Lippi, W. E. Jelkmann, G. L. Salvagno, G. C. Guidi, C. R. Valeri, G. Ragno, B. Kayser, F. Lasne, Y. O. Schumacher, T. Pottgiesser, et al.
Comments on Lundby et al.'s "testing for recombinant human erythropoietin in urine: problems associated with current anti-doping testing". Problems associated with current anti-doping testing: is quality assessment a reliable solution?
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1992 - 1993.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. Lundby
Reply to Lippi et al.'s "Comments on 'Testing for recombinant human erythropoietin in urine: problems associated with current anti-doping testing' "
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105(6): 1997 - 1998.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J. R. Delanghe and M. J. Joyner
Testing for recombinant human erythropoietin
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2008; 105(2): 395 - 396.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.