|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1Institute of Sports Medicine, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Saga Nutraceuticals Research Institute, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Saga, Japan; 3Research Unit, Department of Anaesthesiology, Ribe County Hospital Esbjerg, Esbjerg; and 4Research Centre of Ageing and Osteoporosis, Department of Geriatrics, Glostrup University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
Submitted 3 September 2007 ; accepted in final form 29 April 2008
We evaluated the response of various muscle and bone adaptation parameters with 24 wk of strength training in healthy, early postmenopausal women when a nutrient supplement (protein, carbohydrate, calcium, and vitamin D) or a placebo supplement (a minimum of energy) was ingested immediately following each training session. At inclusion, each woman was randomly and double-blindedly assigned to a nutrient group or a placebo (control) group. Muscle hypertrophy was evaluated from biopsies, MRI, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, and muscle strength was determined in a dynamometer. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using DEXA scans, and bone turnover was determined from serum osteocalcin and collagen type I cross-linked carboxyl terminal peptide. The nutrient group improved concentric and isokinetic (60°/s) muscle strength from 6 to 24 wk by 9 ± 3% (P < 0.01), whereas controls showed no change (1 ± 2%, P > 0.05). Only the nutrient group improved lean body mass (P < 0.05) over the 24 wk. BMD responded similarly at the lumbar spine but changed differently in the two groups at the femoral neck (P < 0.05) [control: 0.943 ± 0.028 to 0.930 ± 0.024 g/mm3 (–1.0 ± 1.4%); nutrient group: 0.953 ± 0.051 to 0.978 ± 0.043 g/mm3 (3.8 ± 3.4%)] when adjusted for age, body mass index, and BMD at inclusion. Bone formation displayed an interaction (P < 0.05), mainly caused by increased osteocalcin at 24 wk in the nutrient group. In conclusion, we report that nutrient supplementation results in superior improvements in muscle mass, muscle strength, femoral neck BMD, and bone formation during 24 wk of strength training. The observed differences following such a short intervention emphasize the significance of postexercise nutrient supply on musculoskeletal maintenance.
exercise; nutrition; muscle hypertrophy
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Lorincz, S. L. Manske, and R. Zernicke Bone Health: Part 1, Nutrition Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach, May 1, 2009; 1(3): 253 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B Verdijk, R. A. Jonkers, B. G Gleeson, M. Beelen, K. Meijer, H. H. Savelberg, W. K. Wodzig, P. Dendale, and L. J. van Loon Protein supplementation before and after exercise does not further augment skeletal muscle hypertrophy after resistance training in elderly men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2009; 89(2): 608 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |