Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 104: 1442-1451, 2008. First published March 6, 2008; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00428.2007
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/5/1442    most recent
00428.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Romer, L. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Romer, L. M.

Effect of expiratory muscle fatigue on exercise tolerance and locomotor muscle fatigue in healthy humans

Bryan J. Taylor and Lee M. Romer

Centre for Sports Medicine and Human Performance, School of Sport and Education, Brunel University, Uxbridge, United Kingdom

Submitted 19 April 2007 ; accepted in final form 3 March 2008

High-intensity exercise (≥90% of maximal O2 uptake) sustained to the limit of tolerance elicits expiratory muscle fatigue (EMF). We asked whether prior EMF affects subsequent exercise tolerance. Eight male subjects (means ± SD; maximal O2 uptake = 53.5 ± 5.2 ml·kg–1·min–1) cycled at 90% of peak power output to the limit of tolerance with (EMF-EX) and without (CON-EX) prior induction of EMF and for a time equal to that achieved in EMF-EX but without prior induction of EMF (ISO-EX). To induce EMF, subjects breathed against an expiratory flow resistor until task failure (15 breaths/min, 0.7 expiratory duty cycle, 40% of maximal expiratory gastric pressure). Fatigue of abdominal and quadriceps muscles was assessed by measuring the reduction relative to prior baseline values in magnetically evoked gastric twitch pressure (Pgatw) and quadriceps twitch force (Qtw), respectively. The reduction in Pgatw was not different after resistive breathing vs. after CON-EX (–27 ± 5 vs. –26 ± 6%; P = 0.127). Exercise time was reduced by 33 ± 10% in EMF-EX vs. CON-EX (6.85 ± 2.88 vs. 9.90 ± 2.94 min; P < 0.001). Exercise-induced abdominal and quadriceps muscle fatigue was greater after EMF-EX than after ISO-EX (–28 ± 9 vs. –12 ± 5% for Pgatw, P = 0.001; –28 ± 7 vs. –14 ± 6% for Qtw, P = 0.015). Perceptual ratings of dyspnea and leg discomfort (Borg CR10) were higher at 1 and 3 min and at end exercise during EMF-EX vs. during ISO-EX (P < 0.05). Percent changes in limb fatigue and leg discomfort (EMF-EX vs. ISO-EX) correlated significantly with the change in exercise time. We propose that EMF impaired subsequent exercise tolerance primarily through an increased severity of limb locomotor muscle fatigue and a heightened perception of leg discomfort.

abdominal muscle fatigue; quadriceps muscle fatigue; dyspnea; leg discomfort; exercise performance



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. M. Romer, Centre for Sports Medicine and Human Performance, School of Sport and Education, Brunel Univ., Uxbridge, UB8 3PH, UK (e-mail: lee.romer{at}brunel.ac.uk)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.