Journal of Applied Physiology Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 104: 747-755, 2008. First published November 29, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01380.2006
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/3/747    most recent
01380.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hidler, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Hidler, J.

Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals

Song Joo Lee1,2 and Joseph Hidler1,2

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Catholic University, and 2Center for Applied Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Research National Rehabilitation Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia

Submitted 5 December 2006 ; accepted in final form 21 November 2007

The goal of this study was to compare treadmill walking with overground walking in healthy subjects with no known gait disorders. Nineteen subjects were tested, where each subject walked on a split-belt instrumented treadmill as well as over a smooth, flat surface. Comparisons between walking conditions were made for temporal gait parameters such as step length and cadence, leg kinematics, joint moments and powers, and muscle activity. Overall, very few differences were found in temporal gait parameters or leg kinematics between treadmill and overground walking. Conversely, sagittal plane joint moments were found to be quite different, where during treadmill walking trials, subjects demonstrated less dorsiflexor moments, less knee extensor moments, and greater hip extensor moments. Joint powers in the sagittal plane were found to be similar at the ankle but quite different at the knee and hip joints. Differences in muscle activity were observed between the two walking modalities, particularly in the tibialis anterior throughout stance, and in the hamstrings, vastus medialis and adductor longus during swing. While differences were observed in muscle activation patterns, joint moments and joint powers between the two walking modalities, the overall patterns in these behaviors were quite similar. From a therapeutic perspective, this suggests that training individuals with neurological injuries on a treadmill appears to be justified.

gait; motion analysis; electromyogram



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: J. Hidler, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Catholic Univ., Pangborn Hall, #104b, 620 Michigan Ave., NE, Washington, DC 20064 (e-mail: hidler{at}cua.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. Hidler, D. Nichols, M. Pelliccio, K. Brady, D. D. Campbell, J. H. Kahn, and T. G. Hornby
Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 5 - 13.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.