Journal of Applied Physiology Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol 104: 75-81, 2008. First published November 1, 2007; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00335.2007
8750-7587/08 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/1/75    most recent
00335.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jubeau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maffiuletti, N. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jubeau, M.
Right arrow Articles by Maffiuletti, N. A.

Comparison between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris for growth hormone response and muscle damage

Marc Jubeau,1 Alessandro Sartorio,2 Pier Giulio Marinone,2 Fiorenza Agosti,2 Jacques Van Hoecke,1 Kazunori Nosaka,3 and Nicola A. Maffiuletti4

1Laboratoire Institut National de la Santè et de la Recherche Médicale U887 Motricité-Plasticité, Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France; 2Laboratorio Sperimentale di Ricerche Auxo-endocrinologiche, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Milan, Italy; 3School of Exercise, Biomedical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia; and 4Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Schulthess Clinic, Zürich, Switzerland

Submitted 26 March 2007 ; accepted in final form 1 November 2007

This study aimed to compare voluntary and stimulated exercise for changes in muscle strength, growth hormone (GH), blood lactate, and markers of muscle damage. Nine healthy men had two leg press exercise bouts separated by 2 wk. In the first bout, the quadriceps muscles were stimulated by biphasic rectangular pulses (75 Hz, duration 400 µs, on-off ratio 6.25–20 s) with current amplitude being consistently increased throughout 40 contractions at maximal tolerable level. In the second bout, 40 voluntary isometric contractions were performed at the same leg press force output as the first bout. Maximal voluntary isometric strength was measured before and after the bouts, and serum GH and blood lactate concentrations were measured before, during, and after exercise. Serum creatine kinase (CK) activity and muscle soreness were assessed before, immediately after, and 24, 48, and 72 h after exercise. Maximal voluntary strength decreased significantly (P < 0.05) after both bouts, but the magnitude of the decrease was significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the stimulated contractions (–22%) compared with the voluntary contractions (–9%). Increases in serum GH and lactate concentrations were significantly (P < 0.05) larger after the stimulation compared with the voluntary exercise. Increases in serum CK activity and muscle soreness were also significantly (P < 0.05) greater for the stimulation than voluntary exercise. It was concluded that a single bout of electrical stimulation exercise resulted in greater GH response and muscle damage than voluntary exercise.

neuromuscular electrical stimulation; isometric strength; blood lactate; creatine kinase; muscle soreness



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: M. Jubeau, Laboratory INSERM U887, Faculty of Sports Sciences, BP 27877, 21078 Dijon cedex, France (e-mail: Marc.Jubeau{at}u-bourgogne.fr)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2008 by the American Physiological Society.