HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 102/6/2104    most recent 00033.2007v2 00033.2007v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Takagawa, J. Articles by Springer, M. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Takagawa, J. Articles by Springer, M. L.

Myocardial infarct size measurement in the mouse chronic infarction model: comparison of area- and length-based approaches

¹University of California, San Francisco, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, San Francisco, California; ²FivePrime Therapeutics, Inc., San Francisco, California

Submitted 8 January 2007 ; accepted in final form 2 March 2007

Efficacy of potential treatments for myocardial infarction (MI) is commonly assessed by histological measurement of infarct size in rodent models. In experiments involving an acute MI setting, measurement of the infarcted area in tissue sections of the left ventricle is a standard approach to determine infarct size. This approach has also been used in the chronic infarct setting to measure infarct area several weeks post-MI. We tested the hypothesis that, because wall thinning is known to occur in the chronic setting, the area measurement approach would be less appropriate. We compared infarct measurements in tissue sections based on 1) infarct area, 2) epicardial and endocardial infarct arc lengths, and 3) midline infarct arc length. Infarct sizes from all three measurement approaches correlated significantly with left ventricular ejection fraction and wall motion abnormality. However, the infarct size values derived from the area measurement approach were significantly smaller than those from the other two measurement approaches, and the range of values obtained was compressed 0.4-fold. The midline method allowed detection of the expected size differences between infarcts of variable severity resulting from proximal vs. distal ligation of the coronary artery. Segmental infarct size was correlated with segmental wall motion abnormality. We conclude that both area- and length-based measurements can be used to determine relative infarct size over a wide range of severity, although the area-based measurements are substantially more compressed due to wall thinning, and that the estimation of infarct midlines is a simple, reliable approach to infarct size assessment.

cardiac remodeling; area-based measurement; length-based measurement; histology

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Lygate Letter to the editor: Infarct size measurements are critically important when comparing interventions affecting ventricular remodeling Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3221 - H3221. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. K. Singla, G. E. Lyon, and T. J. Kamp Reply to "Letter to the editor: Infarct size measurements are critically important when comparing interventions affecting ventricular remodeling" Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H3222 - H3222. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Shioura, D. L. Geenen, and P. H. Goldspink Assessment of cardiac function with the pressure-volume conductance system following myocardial infarction in mice Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): H2870 - H2877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]