HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 102/1/87    most recent 00772.2006v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Vantanajal, J. S. Articles by Poulin, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Vantanajal, J. S. Articles by Poulin, M. J.

Differential sensitivities of cerebral and brachial blood flow to hypercapnia in humans

¹Department of Physiology and Biophysics, ²Cardiac Sciences and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, and ³Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Faculties of ⁴Medicine and ⁵Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Submitted 13 July 2006 ; accepted in final form 27 September 2006

Although it is known that the vasculatures of the brain and the forearm are sensitive to changes in arterial PCO₂, previous investigations have not made direct comparisons of the sensitivities of cerebral blood flow (CBF) (middle cerebral artery blood velocity associated with maximum frequency of Doppler shift; P) and brachial blood flow (BBF) to hypercapnia. We compared the sensitivities of P and BBF to hypercapnia in humans. On the basis of the critical importance of the brain for the survival of the organism, we hypothesized that P would be more sensitive than BBF to hypercapnia. Nine healthy males (30.1 ± 5.2 yr, mean ± SD) participated. Euoxic hypercapnia (end-tidal PO₂ = 88 Torr, end-tidal PCO₂ = 9 Torr above resting) was achieved by using the technique of dynamic end-tidal forcing. P was measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound as an index of CBF, whereas BBF was measured in the brachial artery by echo Doppler. P and BBF were measured during two 60-min trials of hypercapnia, each trial separated by 60 min. Since no differences in the responses were found between trials, data from both trials were averaged to make comparisons between P and BBF. During hypercapnia, P and BBF increased by 34 ± 8 and 14 ± 8%, respectively. P remained elevated throughout the hypercapnic period, but BBF returned to baseline levels by 60 min. The P CO₂ sensitivity was greater than BBF (4 ± 1 vs. 2 ± 1%/Torr; P < 0.05). Our findings confirm that P has a greater sensitivity than BBF in response to hypercapnia and show an adaptive response of BBF that is not evident in P.

cerebral blood flow; sensitivity to carbon dioxide

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. N. Ainslie and J. Duffin Integration of cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity and chemoreflex control of breathing: mechanisms of regulation, measurement, and interpretation Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): R1473 - R1495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.M. Pollock, A.R. Deibler, C.T. Whitlow, H. Tan, R.A. Kraft, J.H. Burdette, and J.A. Maldjian Hypercapnia-Induced Cerebral Hyperperfusion: An Underrecognized Clinical Entity AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2009; 30(2): 378 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]