HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free All Versions of this Article: 100/3/759    most recent 00794.2005v1 Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peroni, J. F. Articles by Robertson, T. P. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Peroni, J. F. Articles by Robertson, T. P.

Predisposition for venoconstriction in the equine laminar dermis: implications in equine laminitis

¹Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Institute of Comparative Medicine, and ²Department of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia

Submitted 5 July 2005 ; accepted in final form 2 November 2005

Equine laminitis is a crippling condition associated with a variety of systemic diseases. Although it is apparent that the prodromal stages of laminitis involve microvascular dysfunction, little is known regarding the physiology of this vasculature. The aim of the present study was to determine the relative responses of equine laminar arteries and veins to the vasoconstrictor agonists phenylephrine (1 nM–10 µM), 5-HT (1 nM–10 µM), PGF₂ (1 nM–100 µM), and endothelin-1 (1 pM–1 µM). We have determined that laminar veins were more sensitive, with respect to the concentration of agonist required to initiate a contractile response and to achieve EC₅₀, for all agonists tested. EC₅₀ values, for veins and arteries, respectively, were 84 ± 7 vs. 688 ± 42 nM for phenylephrine, 35 ± 6 vs. 224 ± 13 nM for 5-HT, 496 ± 43 nM vs. 3.0 ± 0.6 µM for PGF₂, and 467 ± 38 pM vs. 70.6 ± 6.4 nM for endothelin-1. Moreover, when expressed as a percentage of the response to a depolarizing stimulus (80 mM potassium), the maximal contractile response of laminar veins exceeded that for the laminar arteries for each agonist. These results indicate that there may be a predisposition for venoconstriction within the vasculature of the equine digit. While this physiological predisposition for venoconstriction may be important in the regulation of blood flow during exercise, it also may help to explain why laminitis can result from a variety of pathological systemic conditions.

equine laminar arteries; veins