Journal of Applied Physiology http://www.adinstruments.com/labchart/faseb
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 26, 2007). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01361.2006
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
103/1/170    most recent
01361.2006v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dean, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, D. F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dean, J. C.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, D. F
Submitted on November 30, 2006
Accepted on April 25, 2007

Turning on the central contribution to contractions evoked by neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Jesse Craig Dean1, Lisa M Yates2, and David F Collins1*

1 Centre for Neuroscience, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
2 Centre for Neuroscience, Faculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dave.collins{at}ualberta.ca.

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation can generate contractions through peripheral and central mechanisms. Direct activation of motor axons (peripheral mechanism) recruits motor units in an unnatural order, with fatigable muscle fibers often activated early in contractions. The activation of sensory axons can produce contractions through a central mechanism, providing excitatory synaptic input to spinal neurons which recruit motor units in the natural order. Presently, we quantified the effect of stimulation frequency (10-100Hz), duration (0.25-2 second high frequency bursts, or 20 seconds of constant frequency stimulation), and intensity (1-5%MVC torque generated by a brief 100Hz train) on the torque generated centrally. Electrical stimulation (1ms pulses) was delivered over the triceps surae in 8 subjects and plantarflexion torque was recorded. Stimulation frequency, duration, and intensity all influenced the magnitude of the central contribution to torque. Central torque did not develop at frequencies ≤20Hz, and was maximal at frequencies ≥80Hz. Increasing the duration of high frequency stimulation increased the central contribution to torque, as central torque developed over 11 seconds. Central torque was greatest at a relatively low contraction intensity. The largest amount of central torque was produced by a 20 second, 100Hz train (10.7±5.5%MVC) and by repeated 2 second bursts of 80 or 100Hz stimulation (9.2±4.8%MVC and 10.2±8.1%MVC, respectively). Therefore, central torque was maximized by applying high frequency, long duration stimulation while avoiding antidromic block by stimulating at a relatively low intensity. If, as hypothesized, the central mechanism primarily activates fatigue resistant muscle fibers, generating muscle contractions through this pathway may improve rehabilitation applications.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.