Journal of Applied Physiology Information on EB 2010
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 10, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01358.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/6/1674    most recent
01358.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, J. L
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, J. L.
Submitted on December 20, 2007
Accepted on April 4, 2008

Increased ventilation does not impair maximal voluntary contractions of the elbow flexors

Janette L Smith1, Jane E Butler2, Peter G Martin3, Rachel A McBain3, and Janet L. Taylor2*

1 School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
2 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
3 Prince of Wales Medical Research Institute, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jl.taylor{at}unsw.edu.au.

Exercise performance is impaired by increased respiratory work, yet the mechanism for this is unclear. This experiment assessed whether neural drive to an exercising muscle was affected by cortically-driven increases in ventilation. On each of five days, eight subjects completed a 2 min maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexor muscles, followed by 4 min of recovery, while transcranial magnetic stimulation tested for suboptimal neural drive to the muscle. On one day, subjects breathed without instructions under normocapnia. During the 2-min MVC ventilation was ~3.5 times that at rest. On another day, subjects breathed without instruction under hypercapnia. During the 2-min MVC, ventilation was ~1.5 times that on the normocapnic day. On another two days under normocapnia, subjects voluntarily matched their breathing to the uninstructed breathing under normocapnia and hypercapnia using target feedback of the rate and inspiratory volume. On a fifth day under normocapnia, the volume feedback was set to each subject’s vital capacity. On this day, ventilation during the 2-min MVC was ~ twice that on the uninstructed normocapnic day (or ~ 7 times rest). The experimental manipulations succeeded in producing voluntary and involuntary hyperpnea. However, maximal voluntary force, fatigue and voluntary activation of the elbow flexor muscles were unaffected by cortically- or chemically-driven increases in ventilation. Results suggest that any effects of increased respiratory work on limb exercise performance are not due to a failure to drive both muscle groups optimally.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.