Journal of Applied Physiology Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (April 10, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01351.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/6/1656    most recent
01351.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sayde, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carroll, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Sayde, J.
Submitted on December 20, 2007
Accepted on April 1, 2008

Unilateral practice of a ballistic movement causes bilateral increases in performance and corticospinal excitability

Timothy John Carroll1*, Michael Lee2, Marlene Hsu2, and Janel Sayde2

1 Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
2 School of Medical Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: TIMOTHY.CARROLL{at}UQ.EDU.AU.

It has long been known that practicing a task with one limb can result in performance improvements with the opposite, untrained limb. Hypotheses to account for cross-limb transfer of performance state that the effect is mediated either by neural adaptations in higher order control centres that are accessible to both limbs, or that there is a "spill-over" of neural drive to the opposite hemisphere that results in bilateral adaptation. Here we address these hypotheses by assessing performance and corticospinal excitability in both hands after unilateral practice of a ballistic finger movement. Participants (n = 9) completed 300 practice trials of a ballistic task with the right hand, the aim of which was to maximise the peak abduction acceleration of the index finger. Practice caused a 140% improvement in right hand performance, and an 82% improvement for the untrained left hand. There were bilateral increases in the amplitude of responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation, but increased corticospinal excitability was not correlated with improved performance. There were no significant changes in corticospinal excitability or task performance for a control group that did not train (n=9), indicating that performance testing for the left hand alone did not induce performance or corticospinal effects. While the data do not provide conclusive evidence whether increased corticospinal excitability in the untrained hand is causally related to the cross-transfer of ballistic performance, the finding that ballistic practice can induce bilateral corticospinal adaptations may have important clinical implications for movement rehabilitation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.