Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (February 28, 2008). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01348.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
104/5/1381    most recent
01348.2007v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitzner, W.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Mitzner, W.
Submitted on December 19, 2007
Accepted on February 25, 2008

Temporal variability in the responses of individual canine airways to methacholine

Robert H. Brown1*, David Walter Kaczka2, Katherine Fallano3, Sining Chen4, and Wayne Mitzner5

1 Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States; Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States; Radiology, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States
2 Anesthesiology, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States; Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States
3 Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States
4 Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States; Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States; Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States
5 Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States; Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins Univ, United States

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rbrown{at}jhsph.edu.

Previous work showed that individual airway size, prior to any spasmogen, varied widely in the same animals on different days. The effect of this variable baseline size on the airway response to a subsequent challenge is unknown. The present study examined how the variability in individual airway baseline size in dogs was related to that after methacholine challenge on 4 different days using High resolution Computed Tomography scans. Dogs were anesthetized and ventilated, and on 4 separate days randomly varying between 1 and 8 weeks apart, baseline scans were acquired, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of methacholine at 3 rates in increasing order (17, 67, and 200µg/min). As the measure of variability, we used the Coefficient of Variation of the four airway luminal measurements of each airway at baseline and at each dose of methacholine. For most airways, there was wide variability both between and within dogs in the response to a given dose of methacholine (CV=33%-38%). Airways with any level of methacholine stimulation had greater variability than at baseline. The airway variability was greatest at the lowest dose of methacholine administered, but was elevated at all the doses. In conclusion, there was substantial day-to-day variability in baseline airway size. Most importantly, the same dose of methacholine to the same individual airway showed even greater variability than at baseline. If we consider that increased heterogeneity may potentiate clinical symptoms, airway response variability may play an important role in the manifestation of airway disease.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.