Journal of Applied Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J Appl Physiol (January 19, 2006). doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01347.2005
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
100/6/1757    most recent
01347.2005v1
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kalmar, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cafarelli, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kalmar, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Cafarelli, E.
Submitted on October 21, 2005
Accepted on January 9, 2006

Central excitability does not limit postfatigue voluntary activation of quadriceps femoris

J. M. Kalmar1 and E. Cafarelli2*

1 Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
2 Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Kinesiology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ecaf{at}yorku.ca.

Following fatigue, motor evoked potentials (MEP) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEP) elicited by stimulation of the corticospinal tract are depressed. These reductions in corticomotor excitability and corticospinal transmission are accompanied by voluntary activation failure but this may not reflect a causal relationship. Our purpose was to determine whether a decline in central excitability contributes to central fatigue. We hypothesized that if central excitability limits voluntary activation, then a caffeine-induced increase in central excitability should offset voluntary activation failure. In this repeated-measures study, 8 males each attended 2 sessions. Baseline measures of knee extension torque, maximal voluntary activation, peripheral transmission, contractile properties, and central excitability were made prior to administration of caffeine (6 mg/kg) or placebo. The amplitude of vastus lateralis MEPs elicited during minimal muscle activation provided a measure of central excitability. Following a 1-hr rest, baseline measures were repeated before, during, and after a fatigue protocol which ended when maximal voluntary torque declined by 35% (Tlim). Increased prefatigue MEP amplitude (p=0.055) and cortically-evoked twitch (p<0.05) in the caffeine trial indicate that the drug increased central excitability. In the caffeine trial, increased MEP amplitude was correlated with time to task failure (r=0.74, p<0.05). Caffeine potentiated the MEP early in the fatigue protocol (p<0.05) and offset the 40% decline in placebo MEP (p<0.05) at Tlim. However, this was not associated with enhanced maximal voluntary activation during fatigue or recovery demonstrating that voluntary activation is not limited by central excitability.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
S. C. Gandevia and J. L. Taylor
Supraspinal fatigue: the effects of caffeine on human muscle performance
J Appl Physiol, June 1, 2006; 100(6): 1749 - 1750.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1948 by the American Physiological Society.